Laserfiche WebLink
Attorney Vitunac agreed that it would not violate Florida <br />Statute 723. He explained that the County chose the time of the <br />sale of a mobile home as the time the impact fee was due but could <br />have chosen any point in time. He stressed that the County never <br />said that the impact fee was to be passed through to the tenant. <br />Mr. Pitiak agreed with Commissioner Macht's suggestion and <br />felt that would satisfy the mobile home owners in the county. <br />John Grayson, representative of Heritage Village Homeowners, <br />Association, recounted the history of his park's connection to the <br />County water supply and the ensuing legal action. He stated that <br />the residents were pleased when the Commission maintained that the <br />owner is responsible for payment of the water bill. However, a few <br />weeks later, the attorney for Merrill Lynch came before the Board <br />and the Board reversed its position. He accused the Commission of <br />having private meetings with the attorney for Merrill Lynch, and he <br />wanted an explanation of the Commission's action. <br />Attorney Vitunac explained that on October 20, 1992 he gave a <br />report to the Board of the Court's action on the issue of Heritage <br />Village. Attorney Larry Barkett, representing Heritage Village, <br />was in, attendance and spoke for about 15 minutes. After that <br />meeting the attorney for Merrill Lynch asked for equal time. He <br />appeared before the Board on November 24, 1992. Larry Barkett also <br />appeared, and both attorneys had an opportunity to address the <br />Board. <br />Mr. Grayson said that because of the sudden change in the <br />Board's decision, the people in Heritage Village are concerned <br />about the motives of the Commissioners. There were accusations of <br />personal interests, possible affiliations between the Board members <br />and Merrill Lynch, or contributions from Merrill Lynch to the <br />elections of the Commissioners. <br />Commissioner Tippin took exception to the comment and offered <br />to make his financial statement available at any time. <br />Chairman Eggert stated that she has investments but does not <br />deal with Merrill Lynch directly, and she has not received any <br />contributions of any kind for 3 or 4 years. <br />County Administrator Jim Chandler interjected that he was at <br />both meetings and was aware of both motions. He explained that the <br />first motion was to resolve the situation in the best interests of <br />the residents and not force the County to turn the water off. <br />There was a suggestion to file a lien against the park owner. It <br />sounded simple, but as the attorney for Merrill Lynch pointed out, <br />before you file a lien, you must give 30 days notice. If the bill <br />is not paid in 30 days, you shut the water off and then you can <br />file a lien. At the November 24, 1992 meeting, the attorney for <br />F <br />DEC 171992 800K <br />