My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/7/1993
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
1/7/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:51 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 12:21:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/07/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
are losing that quality of life, we are losing tourism and we are <br />losing that resource that taxpayers have been paying for. She is <br />relying on the City Council and County Commission to resolve the <br />issue. <br />William Hoolage, 11 Vista Gardens Trail, asked for <br />clarification regarding the referendum. He noted that we just had <br />a referendum regarding purchase of environmentally sensitive lands. <br />Attorney Vitunac explained that the Constitution requires an <br />election before bonds can be issued which will be supported by ad <br />valorem taxes. The law allows districts to be established which <br />can issue bonds, but only after a referendum. That is why the <br />referendum to purchase environmentally sensitive lands is binding. <br />This County Commission can ask for a referendum at any time, it can <br />make a public announcement that it will go along with the result, <br />but the referendum cannot bind the Commissioners if they change <br />their minds. <br />J. B. Norton, executive director of the Chamber of Commerce, <br />represented himself only. He conceded that the Chamber publishes <br />a brochure which mentions that Indian River County has many <br />beaches, but it does not say where the beaches are located. He <br />urged the Board to address this situation because the stretch of <br />beach within the city limits of Vero Beach is in. dire need of <br />immediate attention and we cannot afford to wait. He felt the <br />Board needs to get the facts, study the situation, see what we have <br />to do, present that to the community, and proceed with it. <br />Denis Scarpinato, director of Conserve Our Resources, stated <br />that his group basically supports the project but not the designs <br />proposed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. He recounted his <br />experience with the original beach committee dealing with the <br />Corps' plan. He stated that Conserve Our Resources advocates the <br />dewatering project. He wanted to see the community work together <br />to protect the environment, protect the buildings and protect our <br />recreational beaches. <br />Councilman Pease wanted the Sebastian Inlet itself to be <br />studied because he felt the sand is not reaching our beaches. He <br />realized that it takes time for beach nourishment but we must try <br />to bring nature back into the process. He suggested extending the <br />Sebastian Inlet Taxing District to the south. <br />Dr. Peter Fallon, Sebastian Inlet Taxing District <br />Commissioner, felt that coastal engineers would argue that <br />virtually every inlet in Florida causes significant down -drift <br />erosion. The problem we are having to date is the actual <br />scientific quantification of how far south the effects of the <br />Sebastian Inlet are felt. He noted that his home is affected by <br />9 <br />JAN 7 1993 <br />BOOK $8 FA{ r 166 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.