My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/12/1993
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
1/12/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:51 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 12:23:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/12/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F"3AN 1 e) inn) <br />r <br />600K o-' �8 PAGE 532 -7 <br />road and if access is required by the County, that option would be <br />gone. Attorney Henderson reported that the developer is against <br />declaring the property as a public road and pointed out that the <br />` trend in South Beach is towards private roads and security gates. <br />_ If the Board decides to require his client to grant access to Mr. <br />O'Haire, then Mr. O'Haire should be required to help pay the <br />construction costs and perhaps reimburse Mr. Krovocheck client for <br />part of the cost of the land as well as sharing future maintenance <br />and security costs. _ ----� <br />Todd Smith, design engineer for the project, responded to Mr. <br />O'Haire's comment that a density of 1.4 units to 1 acre in an area <br />zoned RS -3 is not 11shoehorning,11 and even though Mr. O'Haire <br />disagrees it certainly will be a windfall if Mr. O'Haire does not <br />have to spend a single dime to access the roadway. He felt that in <br />order to justify upholding Mr. .O'Haire's appeal, the Board must <br />determine that Mr. O'Haire's property needs access through Mr. <br />Krovocheck's property. The argument that traffic maneuver <br />conflicts is a concern has very little validity because even during <br />peak hours, there would only be about one vehicle entering AlA <br />every five minutes. Mr. Smith added that two roads side by side <br />are not the same as a four -lane road. He concluded that Mr. <br />Krovocheck's plan does not aggrieve Mr. O'Haire in any way and <br />consideration should be given to the desires of private ownership, <br />as long as the codes and the public's interests are not <br />contravened. <br />Jack Rrovocheck, 565 South Highway AlA, gave the members of <br />the Board a drawing of his proposed development. He discussed how <br />he proposed a property swap about 2-1/2 years ago and offered Mr. <br />O'Haire 77 feet on the river in exchange for some road right-of- <br />way. He thought the plan was very fair, but Mr. O'Haire informed <br />him he was not interested. Since that time, Mr. O'Haire has <br />opposed every permit application he has made, which Mr. Krovocheck <br />felt was an abuse of the system and a waste of the taxpayers' <br />money. The various agencies, recognizing that the opposition had <br />no merit, granted him the necessary permits. Mr. Krovocheck felt <br />that Mr. O'Haire should be required to give up some right-of-way in <br />exchange for access to the road, which would increase the building <br />envelope on both pieces of property and create a win-win situation <br />for everyone concerned. He directed the Board's attention to four <br />letters wherein he tried to negotiate with. Mr. O'Haire without <br />success. Mr. O'Haire wants access to the road without having to <br />contribute towards the cost of building it, and he wants it built <br />58 <br />M r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.