Laserfiche WebLink
C. Resolution Supporting Preservation 2000 Funding <br />The Board reviewed memo from Environmental Planning Chief <br />Roland DeBlois dated February 1, 1993: <br />TO: James E. Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />Obert M. Xeati9rg, AIP17- <br />Community Devel pmen irector <br />FROM: Roland DeBlois��CP <br />Chief, Environmental Planning <br />DATE: February 1, 1993 <br />RE: Resolution Supporting Preservation 2000 Funding <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular <br />meeting of February 9, 1993. <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />Preservation 2000 (P2000) was enacted by the State in 1990 as a ten <br />year, $3 billion environmental lands acquisition program. For the <br />first three years of the program, funding has been subject to re - <br />appropriation on a yearly basis due to the lack of a permanent <br />funding source. So far, funding for P2000 has come from <br />documentary stamp revenues. Without a permanent funding source, <br />the continuance of the P2000 program is in question each fiscal <br />year. <br />The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a leading proponent of the P2000 <br />program. On January 21, 1993, Debbie Keller of TNC contacted staff <br />requesting that the Board of County Commissioners adopt a <br />resolution supporting fourth year appropriation of funding for <br />P2000. TNC is also urging local governments to support the <br />appropriation of a permanent funding source for the remaining seven <br />years of the program. <br />At their regular meeting on January 27, 1993, the County Land <br />Acquisition Advisory Committee (LAAC) voted to recommend that the <br />Board adopt a resolution urging State appropriation of fourth year <br />funding for P2000, as well as supporting the study of a permanent <br />funding source for the program. <br />ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS <br />The P2000 program is the single most important opportunity for the <br />County to obtain matching funds in implementing the recently <br />approved $26 million environmental lands acquisition bond <br />referendum. <br />5 <br />n <br />FEB 9 1993 BOOK 88 F�k,-i i <br />