My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/2/1993 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
3/2/1993 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:52 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 12:49:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/02/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
lots. The proposed changes, along with a graphic that will be <br />inserted into the LDR text, will make the yard designation <br />requirements for corner lots easier to understand. <br />SECTIONS 33 - 36: These sections contain standard legal language <br />that is used in all LDR ordinances. <br />*Conclusion <br />This second proposed ordinance is recommended by staff and the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission and should be adopted by the Board <br />of County Commissioners. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners: <br />1. Provide staff with direction(s) for any changes to either or <br />both of the proposed ordinances; and <br />2. Announce its intention to take final action on both proposed <br />ordinances at the public hearing scheduled for Thursday, March <br />18, 1993 at 5:01 p.m. in the Commission Chambers. <br />Commissioner Adams asked for more clarification on the <br />differences between the New Hibiscus Airport and the others. <br />Director Boling explained that the overflight zones at New <br />Hibiscus Airport are equal to the clear zone areas and are smaller <br />than the other airports. The use at New Hibiscus Airport is less <br />intense than Sebastian or Vero Beach Airports so staff felt it was <br />justifiable to have smaller overflight zones area. Florida Statute <br />333 gives the Board authority to determine the overflight zone but <br />gives no guidance as to size or use restrictions. Director Boling <br />clarified that these requirements apply only to publicly licensed <br />airports and not to private airports. <br />Deputy County Attorney William G. Collins II confirmed that <br />Florida Statute 333 requires the Board to regulate the runway clear <br />zone, which is the more limited area. It is not required by FS 333 <br />to protect the overflight zone, but if the Board feels that some <br />uses are not compatible with airport operations, it is within the <br />Board's general police power authority to regulate in the interest <br />of public health, safety and welfare. The restrictions in the <br />overflight zone were based on recommendations from experts that <br />these uses are not particularly compatible with airport operations. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone <br />wished to be heard in this matter. <br />11 <br />VAR - 21993 BOOK �.� � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.