Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Director Stan Boling commented from the following <br />memorandum dated March 9, 1993: <br />TO: James E. Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />DI ON HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />obert M. Keatin <br />Community Developmen <br />FROM: Stan Boling;'kICP <br />Planning Director <br />DATE: March 9, 1993 <br />irector <br />SUBJECT: Second Hearing: Request to Adopt the Proposed Airport <br />Zoning Ordinance and Other Proposed Land Development <br />Regulation (LDR) Amendments <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its special <br />meeting of March 18, 1993. <br />BACKGROUND AND CONDITIONS-: <br />At its special hearing of March 2, 1993, the Board of County <br />Commissioners reviewed and considered two proposed ordinances: the <br />Airport Zoning Ordinance, and another ordinance containing a <br />collection of LDR amendments (see attachment #1). At the meeting, <br />the Board directed staff to make changes to the Airport Zoning <br />Ordinance. No changes were recommended to be made to the proposed <br />-LDR amendment ordinance. The Board also indicated that it intended <br />to consider final adoption of the ordinances at the March 18, 1993 <br />scheduled special hearing. <br />Staff has made revisions to the Airport Zoning Ordinance based upon <br />direction given by the Board at its March 18th meeting. No <br />revisions have been made to the proposed LDR amendment ordinance. <br />The Board is now to consider final action on both proposed <br />ordinances. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />•Airport Zoning Ordinance <br />Since the March 2nd meeting, planning staff and attorneys office <br />staff revisited every section of the proposed Airport Zoning <br />Ordinance to make the proposal a "bare bones" ordinance. Staff <br />compared sections of the proposed ordinance with the Florida <br />Statutes 333 requirements and related administrative code and FAA <br />regulations. In staff's opinion, the structure of the ordinance <br />(e.g. purpose and intent, definitions, overlay zones, special <br />requirements sections) needs to remain the same to meet FS 333 and <br />related requirements (see attachment #2). <br />previously However, staff <br />determined that certain <br />P y proposed regulations can be <br />eliminated or streamlined. <br />3 <br />MAR 1 8 1993 <br />BOCK 89 FACE 54 <br />