Laserfiche WebLink
r MAR 2 3199 <br />BOOK 89 PkGF123-1 <br />County. The only expenses involved would be food, transportation <br />and lodging and he felt they should take advantage of that offer. <br />Mr. Lavin commended the County Commission and staff for their <br />efforts and cooperation in coordinating with the various agencies <br />to promote business and industry in Indian River County. <br />Chairman Bird was aware, and Commissioner Eggert confirmed, <br />that there is cooperation between the Council of 100 and the Indian <br />River County Economic Development Council (EDC). Chairman Bird <br />pointed out that we want to attract business and industry to our <br />county, but we must have an appealing situation to entice them to <br />relocate here in terms of site availability and tax activity. He <br />felt the Council of 100 members have an opportunity to get feedback <br />from the various business and industry leaders to see what Indian <br />River County can do and to have a good exchange of ideas. <br />Commissioner Eggert agreed that we have been working to <br />welcome business and industry into our community by extending the <br />sewer and water lines to the interstate highway and by our efforts <br />to change the method of payment of impact fees and land development <br />regulations to cut costs and make things better for developers. <br />Commissioner Eggert mentioned the tax abatement referendum, and <br />thought that would be a big plus for our county. <br />Commissioner Macht agreed that we have a unique opportunity to <br />attract industry and job -producing companies to our area, but he <br />did not believe the stated plan is the way to do it. He described <br />it as a shotgun approach when a directed, rifle approach is needed. <br />There have been allegations in the past that government is the <br />obstacle in the way of industrialization and is opposed to <br />attracting light businesses to our community, but he thought those <br />allegations have been dropped. He thought that the County <br />Commission and staff have streamlined the process for developers, <br />for instance, by extending utilities to industrial nodes, and he <br />felt that we should continue that process. He did not favor the <br />proposal of going to trade shows and trade missions to attract <br />responses. He thought that if we were successful and received many <br />responses, we could not deal with it. He described the Council's <br />proposal as an archaic marketing plan that went out of style 3 or <br />4 years ago. He suggested that if we are serious about locating <br />industries in our county, we should go out to where the utilities <br />are going and develop a partnership or joint venture industrial <br />park, because companies must have somewhere to build. Commissioner <br />Macht thought the proposed plan is a waste of time and taxpayers' <br />funds, and was opposed to its approval. He is and has been in <br />favor of sensible business expansion and industrialization because <br />we need jobs. He anticipated that the proposed plan would dissipate <br />32 <br />