Laserfiche WebLink
• Background <br />From a peak of $815,719 in FY &8-89, building division operating <br />revenues dropped to $471,932 in FY91-92. That represents a 42.2% <br />decrease in annual revenue between those two fiscal years. While <br />revenues have fallen significantly over the past three years, the <br />workload has not decreased as much. Measured by number of permits <br />issued and number of inspections conducted, the building division's <br />work load decreased from 39,819 in FY 88-89 to 31,770 in FY 91-92. <br />That represents a 20.2% decrease. <br />Since the building division functions as an enterprise account, the <br />continual loss of revenue has made a significant difference. <br />Because of this revenue reduction, the building division's expenses <br />have exceeded its revenues for the past three fiscal years. In <br />1990-1991, there was a $278,000 shortfall, while in 1991-1992 there <br />was a $395,502 shortfall, and in 1992-1993 the deficit is currently <br />projected to be $301,311. <br />Because the building division had accumulated a reserve of over <br />$1,100,000 by the end of FY 1989-1990, there was sufficient money <br />to continue operations even with an annual shortfall. In fact, the <br />purpose of having the reserve was to compensate for the cyclical <br />nature of the construction industry. <br />Although the enterprise account reserve compensated for the revenue <br />shortfall when construction activity declined in FY90-91, staff <br />realized that the reserve could not make up the revenue deficit <br />indefinitely. For that reason, staff started monitoring building <br />division revenue and expenditures closely. Not only did staff <br />continually assess construction activity, but staff also projected <br />revenues and cash position on a regular basis. <br />While it initially appeared that the construction slowdown would be <br />temporary, it soon became apparent that a recovery would not occur <br />quickly. Consequently, staff determined that expenditures would <br />need to be reduced to lessen the deficit. Staff did take a number <br />of actions to cut costs, and these did reduce the difference <br />between monthly expenditures and monthly revenues. <br />• Cost Reduction <br />Since late in calendar year 1990, building division costs have been <br />reduced substantially. This has involved reducing capital <br />expenditures, cutting operating costs, and eliminating staff <br />positions. Even with these actions, however, costs still exceed <br />revenues by a significant amount each month. <br />The most significant of the cost reductions has been a staff cut <br />of 5 positions. Since 1990, building division staff positions have <br />been reduced from 21 to 16. This reduction was accomplished by <br />eliminating an unfilled inspector position, eliminating a vacant <br />clerk position, and then eliminating three other positions -- a <br />plans examiner, an inspector, and a clerk. While the first <br />position was eliminated in FY 90-91, the other four were cut in FY <br />91-92. A copy of the memo sent to the Board of County <br />Commissioners regarding the last three position cuts is attached to <br />this memo. <br />Besides eliminating positions, staff also cut costs by eliminating <br />capital expenditures. This has involved cutting programmed <br />computer expenses as well as cutting approved vehicle replacement <br />costs. No capital expenses are included within the 1992-1993 <br />budget. In addition, staff has reduced operating costs by reducing <br />travel expenses, supply costs, and other operating costs as much as <br />possible. -- <br />39 <br />MAR 2 31993 860K 8 0 FA E 135 <br />