My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/13/1993
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
4/13/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:53 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 12:57:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/13/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 89 PAGE •)15 <br />Given Indian River County's population and motor fuel tax <br />collection amount, the two factors used to distribute other <br />transportation funds, the MPO's enhancement fund allocation would <br />be only 3.87% of the total district funds, if the district <br />allocates enhancement funds by MPO and if the statutory formula <br />distribution method is used. <br />Regardless of the distribution method used, the MPO will need to <br />prioritize enhancement projects. As specified in the recent FDOT <br />directive, however, that prioritization will not have to be done <br />until August, with a September submittal of the priority list to <br />FDOT. <br />For any enhancement project not located on state or federal <br />property, a 10% local match is required. That match could be <br />provided by an interest group proposing a project, by another local <br />government, or•by the Board of County Commissioners. At present, <br />county staff is evaluating potential projects for submittal as <br />enhancement applications. <br />Director Keating further explained that staff is developing <br />applications for sidewalks and bikeways which would be consistent <br />with the County's sidewalk and bikeway needs and plans. The Indian <br />River County Bike Path Commission was given an application. There <br />also have been discussions at Metropolitan Planning Organization <br />(MPO) meetings regarding other enhancement projects, such as Jungle <br />Trail. One consideration is that the MPO does not have a separate <br />funding source so that any local government or private group which <br />wants to sponsor a project would have to provide matching funds or <br />request the County Commission to pay for the match. <br />Commissioner Adams led discussion regarding the actual <br />construction. of these projects, and Public Works Director Jim Davis <br />explained that the County can enter into a joint program with DOT <br />on construction decisions, but funding must be programmed in DOT's <br />5 -year work program. <br />Commissioner Eggert asked, and Director Keating clarified that <br />the matching funds would be 10 percent local and 10 percent state <br />for a total of 20 percent. <br />Discussion ensued regarding Ms. Harrow's request for funds to <br />defray the expense of attending the workshop. <br />Director Davis advised that Capital Projects Manager Terry <br />Thompson is scheduled to attend that workshop. <br />Chairman Bird stated that if staff were not going to the <br />workshop�he might give consideration to Ms. Harrow's request, but <br />under the circumstances the Board could not grant her request for <br />funds. <br />Commissioner Adams recommended that Ms. Harrow approach bike <br />shop owners and Chamber of Commerce members for funds. <br />Chairman Bird appreciated Ms. Harrow's interest and felt that <br />her enthusiasm and influence would go far in promoting additional <br />bikeways in the county. <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.