Laserfiche WebLink
DISCIIBBION REGARDING AABASSO FLEA MARKET <br />Commissioner Adams advised that she added this to today's <br />Agenda after receiving numerous phone calls from residents in the <br />Wabasso area who wish to continue frequenting the flea market <br />activities in the old post office building. <br />Community Development Director Robert Keating advised that <br />this matter came up before the Code Enforcement Board yesterday. <br />Activities taking place at 87th Street in Wabasso meet the <br />definition of a flea market according to our Code. Our definition <br />of a flea market is very specific and based on the information we <br />have gotten and personal observation by some of the staff, the use <br />constitutes a flea market. According to the Code, flea markets are <br />allowed as administrative permitted uses in the CH and IL zoning <br />districts. They are administrative permit uses because that allows <br />additional criteria over and above those that would be applied to <br />any permitted uses to be established and applied to these uses when <br />they come in. Generally, it has been the County's position in the <br />past to discourage flea markets, particularly in the lower <br />intensity districts like CL which have high visibility because they <br />are along major roadways and associated with a lot of retail. Flea <br />markets are allowed in districts that have industrial uses, <br />warehouse uses, and contractor trade uses. Generally, that has <br />worked well in the past and seems to make sense. Some of the <br />characteristics of flea markets is that generally they are not <br />aesthetic and are not perceived as the best -looking use out there. <br />If they are not carefully controlled, they will develop noise and <br />traffic circulation problems and have other adverse effects. This <br />particular flea market activity is located in a CG district, and CG <br />does not allow flea markets. All the indications are that even <br />though the use is not allowed, the scope of the activity is kept <br />moderate and there are not any actual problems with it at the <br />present time. It is hard to say that this particular use should <br />not be allowed there since it seems to be working out. This went <br />to Code Enforcement because there was a complaint. If this use is <br />allowed in one particular situation, it has to be allowed in all <br />similar situations. Therefore, if this particular use is deemed <br />appropriate for General Commercial (CG), then it would have to be <br />allowed generally throughout the CG districts with the same <br />restrictions and conditions. In'other circumstances, there is no <br />guarantee that the use would be as well maintained or as well <br />conducted. Staff has looked at several ways to solve the <br />situation. One would be to rezone to CH zoning, but a site plan <br />would have to be approved and any necessary infrastructure put in. <br />Another would be a change in the Land Development Regulations <br />27 <br />APR 71993 boa 89 P,* -378 <br />