My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/27/1993
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
4/27/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:53 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:01:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/27/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M <br />The Board indicated their agreement to have staff look into <br />our ordinances regarding this matter and come back with a <br />recommendation. <br />CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE <br />(Withdrawn for discussion at a later date.) <br />PUBLIC DISCLOSURE MATTERS <br />Commissioner Tippin advised that he added this to the Agenda <br />after talking to his neighbor who was surprised to find that <br />someone else had obtained from public records a complete set of <br />plans of his new beautiful home. Commissioner Tippin strongly <br />questioned whether that should be allowed, particularly in these <br />days of high technology thievery with someone knowing the location <br />of your security measures. He would like the County Attorney to <br />have permission to look into it with the thought that if we cannot <br />circumvent it, perhaps there can be some notification to the <br />property owner that someone has obtained a set of their plans. <br />Attorney Collins explained that basically the situation is <br />that any document received becomes a public record and is open to <br />inspection and copying by anybody. The County cannot put <br />restrictions on who gets that material unless there is an exemption <br />from the public records law in Florida Statutes and that would <br />require an act of the legislature. We could, as a matter of policy <br />and at Board direction, notify an owner that a copy of his plans <br />has been made. We cannot, however, require that someone identify <br />themselves when requesting copies of plans. State law says that <br />any person who pays the fees gets the records. If their name is <br />known or they make that available to us, we could notify property <br />owners that their plans have been copied. The other side of this <br />is that the architect has been paid considerable money by the <br />property owner for a unique set of plans and someone else could <br />come in and have the benefit of them. However, he felt that is <br />more of a civil matter that the architect could pursue. Apart from <br />notifying people of who got copies of their plans, there is very <br />little we can do at a local level. The Board may want to consider <br />referring this to the Legislative Delegation because some of the <br />issues that have been raised are personal safety and <br />confidentiality. The legislature may consider exempting or at <br />least giving some additional protection so that you know who got <br />the records in the event of a break-in. <br />Steve Payton, 625 SW 34th Avenue, was very concerned that <br />anyone can get a copy of someone else's home, especially when you <br />51 <br />APP 2 71993 BOOK 89 F�Ac40 <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.