Laserfiche WebLink
TO: James E. Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />. FoR <br />Robert M. Rea ng, AICP <br />Community Development Director <br />FROM: Stan Boling, AICP <br />Planning Director <br />DATE: May 3, 1993 <br />SUBJECT: Request from Town of Indian River Shores Regarding <br />Residential Resort Uses in the RM -6 Zoning District <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular <br />meeting of May 11, 1993. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Recently, the Board of County Commissioners received a letter from <br />Indian River Shores Mayor Robert Schoen regarding the LDR <br />amendments adopted in March that allow residential resort projects <br />as special exception uses in the RM -6, RM -8, and RM -10 zoning <br />districts (see attachment #1). The letter included a request that <br />the "...Board of County Commissioners direct staff to initiate the <br />action to restore all RM -6 parcels to their "pre -March 1993 status" <br />(see attachment #2). The letter states that the Town's request is <br />not to oppose the proposed Disney resort project but rather to <br />"...restore all other RM -6 parcels to their pre -March 1993 status". <br />Planning staff has revisited the resort residential regulations in <br />light of the concerns expressed. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />As noted in staff's January 14, 1993 presentation to the Planning <br />and Zoning Commission and in staff's March 1993 presentations to <br />the Board of County Commissioners, analysis indicates that the type <br />of residential resort projects now allowed under the LDRs will have <br />no greater (and probably less) negative traffic, density, and <br />aesthetic impacts than the conventional multi -family development <br />allowed "by right" in -the RM -6 zoning district. Also, staff's <br />survey of 15 central and south Florida local governments indicates <br />that jurisdictions treat residential resort type uses in a variety <br />of ways, as either multi -family uses, residential "conditional <br />uses", or commercial uses. Consequently, it appears to county <br />staff that the residential "conditional use" approach is a logical, <br />middle of the road approach which recognizes that residential <br />resort projects can be made to be appropriate and compatible in <br />higher density multi -family zoning districts. Furthermore, it is <br />staff's opinion that as a special exception use, the county has the <br />ability to properly regulate and attach reasonable conditions to <br />any such project proposal. <br />ALTERNATIVES: <br />There are several alternatives available to the Board in responding <br />to the Indian River Shores request. These include the following: <br />47 <br />BOOK 89 F.,,r,512 <br />r <br />