Laserfiche WebLink
d. The process which allowed the land use change to occur <br />without prior knowledge of the municipalities and the <br />citizens most directly concerned, and which has led to <br />extreme divisiveness in the community, is strongly <br />opposed. <br />5. The variances to the intent and specific language of the <br />Comprehensive Plan pose grave risks to the community. <br />Protection of the county's rich and varied environmental re- <br />sources was stated as a Plan goal. With the present approv- <br />al to allow commercial activity in residential areas, the <br />county's most precious natural resources, its shorelands, <br />are at risk with consequential financial and job related <br />impacts over the long run. Following are some of the risks <br />to Indian River County: <br />a. Residential resorts (e.g. hotel/motel operations) and <br />related commercial activity may expand into the 500 <br />acres available between John's Island and Route 510. <br />We have reason to believe that three of the major hotel <br />chains are considering Disney's move with possible <br />interest of their own. <br />b. Under the current zoning, allowing hotel/motel opera- <br />tions in any RM -6 areas, and with the special excep- <br />tions expected to be granted to Disney, it is doubtful <br />that other entrants may be denied similar approval. <br />I.e. by the actions taken to date the.County and the <br />towns will have lost control. <br />as Hotel/motel chains, like all major corporations, are <br />managed for profit. They employ centralized purchasing <br />and other centralized practices to control cost. <br />Therefore, with hotel/motel operations.-' as opposed to <br />private ownership - little real benefit is expected to <br />accrue to area merchants and contractors. Nor will <br />there be much impact on area jobs, other.than in manual <br />and entry level positions. <br />d. In the likley event that hotel/motel operations begin <br />to pre-empt residential space in the scenic shorelands <br />areas, property values will deteriorate. Residents who <br />had orgiinally selected Indian River County for its <br />scenic attractions may seek other destinations, and <br />potential new property owners may be deterred. <br />e. The adverse impact on present and future area business- <br />es may be similarly dramatic. At present, Indian River <br />County's scenic beauty and uncrowded conditions repre- <br />sent strong selling points for drawing new business 'to <br />the area. Eliminate that, and Indian River may become <br />just another area in economic decline. <br />6. For the reasons stated above, we respectfully appeal to the <br />Board of Commissioners either to reverse the March, 1993 <br />decision allowing hotel/motel operations in RM -6 areas (with <br />exception for Disney's proposal) or to institute new safe- <br />guards within the present zoning to positively preclude <br />further proliferation of such resorts. <br />We thank the Board for its consideration of our petitions. <br />Mr. Bibow believed that the ratio requirement proposal made a <br />lot of sense, and urged the Board to give it careful consideration. <br />51 <br />Boa PnI F 516 <br />MAY i 11993 � <br />