My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/25/1993
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
5/25/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:53 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:07:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/25/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAY 2 Bou89 FacF663� <br />the correction of nodes mistakenly expanded in the absence of <br />demand for more C/I designated land. <br />Compatibility with the Surrounding Area <br />The potential impact of the subject request upon surrounding land <br />uses is an important issue. As situated, the subject property is <br />located across 73rd Street from Copeland's Landing West. This is <br />an approved, but as yet unfinished, Planned Residential Development <br />subdivision. Additionally, the area adjacent to and east of the <br />subject property is designated for low density residential <br />development. <br />A land use change for the subject property would have two negative <br />impacts upon existing and proposed residences in the area. <br />First, there would be a lack <br />and residential development. <br />land use and zoning district <br />question that the resulting <br />adjacent residential areas. <br />neighborhood quality of life. <br />of compatibility between commercial <br />Given the type of uses allowed by the <br />requested for the site, there is no <br />uses would be incompatible with the <br />It would be an intrusion into the <br />The second negative impact from the proposed land use amendment <br />involves more than the property itself; it relates to all <br />residentially designated areas along U.S. #1. These areas would be <br />affected, because the requested change would provide an impetus for <br />other property owners to request that their land use designation be <br />changed to commercial/industrial. The result would be commercial/ <br />industrial land use designations all along the east side of U.S. <br />#1. This would cause compatibility problems along the east side of <br />U.S. #1. <br />Potential Impact on Environmental Quality <br />In addition to a review of compatibility with surrounding uses and <br />consistency with the comprehensive plan, environmental impacts of <br />the proposed change have also been reviewed. <br />In implementing the policies of the county comprehensive plan, Land <br />Development Regulations Chapter 929 requires that 158 of the native <br />upland plant community existing on site be preserved via the <br />establishment of a conservation easement in conjunction with site <br />development. The 158 may be reduced to 108 if the native preserve <br />area is one contiguous "clump", rather than a linear buffer strip <br />or multiple, noncontiguous areas.- County regulations allow the <br />option of a fee -in -lieu payment instead of a set-aside, based on <br />the assessed value of the subject -property. <br />The upland set-aside requirement would apply to the subject <br />property under the proposed commercial designation as well as under <br />the present -residential zoning and land use category. Therefore, <br />from the regulatory standpoint, the proposal would not affect the <br />minimum amount required by the county for native upland protection. <br />The subject property has not been surveyed for rare or endangered <br />plant or animal species. An environmental survey will be required <br />prior to site development, under either the present or proposed <br />zoning and land use designation. If the environmental survey <br />reveals the presence of listed rare or endangered species, the <br />applicant would be required to coordinate with jurisdictional <br />wildlife agencies to ensure compliance with all applicable federal, <br />state, and local requirements concerning such species' (and <br />habitat)_protection. <br />Development of the Subiect Props <br />At approximately 6.3 and 8.8 acres, both parcels comprising the <br />subject property are large enough to subdivide. The southern <br />parcel could accommodate up to 18 single- or multiple -family homes, <br />62 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.