Laserfiche WebLink
11 <br />M <br />M <br />coogaratiLve use of channels in terms of MXstem confiauration. <br />tne r-wo maln Mectives wltn tne new ut:Llization 2lan 0 ith eleven <br />(11) channels allocated at that time, the system in this county would <br />have had to commit to eleven hundred (1,iOO) units in service or <br />operation in five (5) years (one hundred per station or channel). <br />The county and other agencies collectively have in excess of this <br />many radio units being utilized presently. <br />Because of the possibility of losing the channel allocation, on <br />February 18, 1992, the Board of County Commissioners considered a <br />request by staff to fund a $7,672 study of the existing <br />communications system and the potential benefit of an 80OMHz Public <br />Safety Trunked radio system. The study was -needed to provide staff <br />and the Board with sufficient information to determine if an <br />application should be filed within the window May 7, 1992,, for, <br />securing the allocation of channels available. <br />The original request by staff to the Board in 1992 was predicated on <br />the fact that meetings had been held with municipality and agency <br />representatives, several of which alluded to severe problems with <br />interference,, dead spots, limited portable radio capability,, and <br />skips in the current VHF and UHF spectrum being utilized. <br />The window for filing the application was extended by the FCC to <br />September, however, the Board decided it did not want to expend the <br />funding required for the study. The consultants bids for the study <br />ranged from $7,672 to $56,708. Based upon the Board's action, staff <br />notified the Regional Committee -that an application would not be <br />forthcoming and the Indian River County allocation of channels were <br />returned to a pool per FCC rules and made available for any other <br />entity to obtain and utilize in another agency communications system. <br />Since that time, the window for filing expired and another window has <br />now been opened. The new period for filing is May 1, 1993, to August <br />31.. 1993. Applications to obtain channels will only be accepted <br />during this time frame by the regional committee, APCOI Division of <br />Communications, and the FCC. <br />Staff has been meeting with the various emergency providers and <br />agencies in the county regarding current and future communications <br />needs. The problems stated in 1992 remain unresolved and will not <br />improve given the emphasis manufacturers are placing on newer <br />technology. <br />Another problem that now confronts public safety entities is the fact <br />that the FCC is currently holding hearings on spectrum refarming in <br />the VHF and UHF spectrums. This is contained in FCC PR Docket Number <br />92-235. The FCC Notice of Proposed Rule Changes concerns and will <br />impact every public safety organization in one way or another. <br />The one inch thick document would become effective in 1996. if <br />approved in total, the new rules would render current equipment <br />unauthorized and would have to be replaced due to not meeting the now <br />specifications; the range reduction to 3 KHz deviation will result <br />in range reduction of 40% plus problems generating sufficient receive <br />audio output power in high noise areas; and the reduced deviation <br />will cause CTCSS and pager decoder failure. Simply stated, the above <br />changes mean major ezpenditure of funds for old technology,, <br />unreliable system Performance,, reduced transmitter power which <br />trnnslates into reduced coverager and would cause serious spurious <br />emissions from Power amplifiers. <br />21 <br />JUN - 81993 BOOK 89 FnF774 <br />