My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/15/1993
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
6/15/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:53 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:09:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/15/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO.: James -E. Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />Robeer/&W Kealtin%,,�,AICP <br />Community Develoodent Director <br />".1-0 <br />FROM: Stan Boling, AICP <br />Planning Director <br />DATE: June 29, 1993 <br />SUBJECT: Kay Garling's Request for Rezoning Consideration: <br />Colonial Gardens Phase I Subdivision <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given f ormal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular <br />meeting of June 15, 1993. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Mo. Kay Garling owns and occupies a house located at 1123 9th <br />Square, on Lot 18 of Colonial Gardens Phase 1 Subdivision. Phase <br />I of * the subdivision lies within the RM -6 zoning district <br />(Residential Multi -Family up to' 6 units per acre) I although all of <br />Phase 1 has been platted for single-family development (note: all <br />units constructed in Phase 1 are single-family units). Phase 2 of <br />the subdivisions, which has been constructed but has not yet <br />received final plat approvals, is located immediately north of Phase <br />1 and was rezoned in 1992 from RM -6 to RS -6 (Residential Single - <br />Family up to 6 units per acre). Setbacks in the RM -6 district are <br />more restrictive than RS -6 setbacks, as illustrated below: <br />Zoning District Setback Area <br />RS -6 Front yard <br />Side yard <br />Rear yard <br />RM -6 Front yard <br />Side yard <br />Rear yard <br />Reauired Setback <br />20' <br />10, <br />201 <br />251 <br />10, <br />251 <br />Ms. Garling desires to have a screened porch on the rear of her <br />house, utilizing an existing roof overhang and patio area. Such a <br />structure could not comply with the RM -6 251 rear yard requirement. <br />However, the desired structure could comply with the RS -6 20, rear <br />yard requirement. Mo. Garling has Purportedly contacted Phase 1 <br />residents and the subdivision developer regarding a possible <br />rezoning, and wishes to have Phase 1 rezoned from RM -6 to RS -6. <br />Such a rezoning would reduce the setback requirements and allow for <br />No. Garlingis screened porch,, and would also be consistent with the <br />single family development of Phase 1 and the zoning of Phase 2. <br />MO. Garling is now requesting that the Board of County <br />Commissioners direct staff to initiate the rezoning request (see <br />attachment #2). <br />35 <br />101MINK"M <br />BOOK F -A, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.