Laserfiche WebLink
F-- J U N 2 A 10 a", <br />1) <br />2) <br />BOOK 89 FAGF 948 -1 <br />Research the changes in State law pertaining to use of <br />tourist taxes. <br />Bring our ordinance into compliance with State law. <br />3) Pass the additional one cent tax and be sure that the <br />language in the ordinance meets State law and provides the <br />flexibility that is needed. <br />Mr. Little stressed that there is no purpose in advertising <br />for tourists if there are no beaches for them to enjoy. Mr. Little <br />also suggested that the County rescind its previous decision on the <br />tourist tax allocation and reallocate $80,0000-$100,000 of the <br />current money to the BSPAC so that they will have $50,000 front <br />money plus whatever else is needed to proceed with the PEP reef <br />permitting process so that we don't have to wait until the <br />ordinance to levy an additional one cent becomes effective in <br />September or October. He f elt that still gives the Chamber of <br />Commerce more than they need or expected to get. <br />Commissioner Adams stated that the primary reason to restore <br />the beach is for storm protection and because of that there is a <br />certain commitment of the property owners on the barrier island to <br />contribute to this. She really believed that we need to consider <br />creating an erosion control taxing district for those - areas <br />benefiting from storm protection. She didn't feel we should fund <br />the whole thing. Those are things the BSPAC will be looking at. <br />George Gross, former staff member of the City's beach <br />committee, advised that a certain amount of money is needed to get <br />the engineering started. He felt we need anywhere from $50,000 to <br />$100,000 now in order to get an engineering firm started on <br />collecting the needed data to get construction started by next <br />year. <br />Councilman Jordan asked why we don't have sufficient data <br />considering the fact we have been studying this problem for 20 <br />years. <br />Mr. Gross explained that we found out that we don't have reefs <br />formed from crustaceans, we have rocks. Another unknown is the <br />distance from shore for which the County would be responsible. The <br />$10,000 study basically took a few pictures, and we need to know <br />the distance to take it from the water line out to a minus 10 feet <br />and the bottom conditions at that exact point. He noted that the <br />Palm Beach project is about 200 feet off shore at a point of minus <br />9 feet. <br />Commissioner Adams explained that if the sand builds up from <br />the shoreline over the years, the reef can be moved further out. <br />She was not in favor of reallocating the Tourist Development <br />4 <br />M M M <br />