My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/27/1993
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
7/27/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:54 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:08:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/27/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
require something comparable to an urban service area. For example <br />local governments must delineate land use boundaries, base those <br />boundaries on availability of facilities (and other factors), <br />provide a clear separation between urban and rural uses, and <br />establish water and sewer service extension areas. Consequently, <br />lines must be drawn, and policies addressing these issues must be <br />adopted. <br />0 Indian River County Comprehensive Plan <br />Like many other counties in the state, Indian River County adopted <br />an urban service area boundary as part of its comprehensive plan. <br />Based upon existing development patterns, existing service areas, <br />and proposed service areas, the county's urban service area <br />encompasses those lands that are served by or will be served by the <br />full range of urban services and facilities. By definition, the <br />urban service area is that portion of the county which can support <br />urban type land uses. <br />In establishing its urban service area, the county developed <br />various policies addressing urban service area functions. Among <br />these policies are a prohibition on extension of urban services <br />outside of the USA, a prohibition on establishing urban land uses <br />outside the USA, and a commitment to provide urban services within <br />the USA. <br />During plan preparation, staff felt that establishing an urban <br />service area and a USA boundary was not only useful, but necessary. <br />Besides serving as a basis for setting land use designations, the <br />urban service area provided a target on which utility master plans <br />could be based. Utility line extensions, even more so than other <br />types of projects, must be based upon service area limits and <br />demand projections. With an established urban service area, the <br />necessary utility master planning can be done with more certainty. <br />Although the county's urban service area boundary establishes the <br />limits of urban development in the county, the county's future land <br />use map would not be any different without the USA. The reason for <br />that is that both the USA boundary and the county's land use <br />pattern were ultimately established through negotiation with the <br />state Department of Community Affairs (DCA). To address issues <br />such as urban sprawl, overallocation of residential land, <br />agricultural preservation, and others that arose after plan <br />adoption, the county made significant changes to its future land <br />use plan map and urban service boundary. <br />In setting its urban service area boundary, the county used <br />roadways, as much as possible, as dividing lines. This not only <br />provided an easily identifiable boundary, but also served as a <br />physical separation between urban and rural uses and between <br />residential and agricultural uses. <br />o Plan Amendment <br />The issue of roadways serving as urban service area boundaries <br />arose in 1991. It was then that David Feldman submitted a land use <br />plan amendment request for forty acres of land west of and <br />bordering Rings Highway. <br />Mr. Feldman's request was to expand the urban service area to <br />encompass his property and to change the land use plan designation <br />for his property from AG -1 to R. As justification for the <br />amendment, the point was raised that having roadways which serve as <br />utility line corridors as urban service area boundaries and <br />prohibiting utility service to land on one side of those roadways <br />13 <br />LJUL �? M3 ROOK 90PAGE 49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.