My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/8/1993
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
9/8/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:55 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:26:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/08/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 90 PAGE 488 <br />departments are operating at minimum or even on the down side of <br />that, and a 10 percent cut may put them out of business and rob the <br />public of a vital service. He thought that each department should <br />be analyzed separately. We may not be able to control assessments, <br />or what the Property Appraiser does, but the people have a right to <br />know what he does. Commissioner Macht stated that he would like to <br />see a geographic analysis of the assessments throughout the county <br />because he suffered a considerable increase in his assessment, and <br />he was sure everybody else would like that information. He <br />observed that government seems to be unable to convey to the public <br />the message of the plans we are responsible for and the method we <br />use to discharge them. He noted the misunderstanding regarding the <br />3 percent cap, which is really the 3 percent cap on increases in <br />assessments and is quite different from a tax cap. The <br />differential in assessments this year is most likely an effort to <br />forestall the consequences of the 3 percent cap in the future. He <br />cautioned that assessments on property which is rapidly accreting <br />in actual value can be increased only at that 3 percent. As a <br />result, most of us with average assessed values will pay a <br />disproportionately higher amount than the higher valued property. <br />Commissioner Macht affirmed that there are many things beyond our <br />control and the Board members have done the best we can with what <br />we have. Perhaps we should make a greater effort to work with the <br />whole vertical structure of government. There are many things we <br />want to do; others we are forced to do in the form of mandates. We <br />congratulated ourselves a few years back when the legislature <br />passed a law saying they cannot pass unfunded mandates with less <br />than three quarters of the legislature voting, but there are many <br />ways of doing it de facto by passing regulations for non-productive <br />environmental regulations. A lot of it is vital; a lot of it is <br />not productive but we are saddled with it. One example is the 6 <br />new employees for the Solid Waste Disposal District. Commissioner <br />Macht pointed out that salaries for those employees are not seen in <br />the General Fund but they will show up in the rates. He asked the <br />public to remember that the Board members are ordinary people <br />trying to struggle through a very difficult process. Government <br />includes not only the Board but the public as well, and the Board <br />has a responsibility to include the public in the budget process. <br />The public must realize that when we build a new courthouse or <br />library, we pay for it one time, but there are additional operating <br />costs that never go away and never decrease. Commissioner Macht <br />assured the public that the Commissioners confront those problems <br />everyday and take that responsibility very seriously. <br />20 <br />® M M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.