Laserfiche WebLink
a. Vero Lake Estates M.S.T.U. <br />Street Lighting Districts <br />b. Gifford <br />c. <br />Laurelwood <br />d. <br />Rockridge <br />e. <br />Vero Highlands <br />f. <br />Porpoise Point <br />g. <br />Laurel Court <br />h. <br />Tierra Linda <br />i. Vero Shores <br />j. Ixora Park <br />k. Royal Poinciana <br />1. Roseland Road <br />m. Walker's Glen <br />n. Glendale Lakes <br />o. Floralton Beach <br />BOOK 90 Pi,494 <br />Charge Per <br />Parcel/Acre <br />$ 15.00 <br />$ 19.50 <br />$ 22.00 <br />$ 15.00 <br />$ 20.00 <br />$ 30.00 <br />$ 33.00 <br />$ 42.00 <br />$ 26.00 <br />$ 23.00 <br />$ 28.00 <br />$ 6.00 <br />$ 40.50 <br />$ 24.00 <br />$ 32.50 <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone <br />wished to be heard in this matter. <br />Jeff Diggs, 1908 First Place Southwest, Eastview Gardens in <br />the Ixora Park Street Lighting District, asked how the County <br />arrived at the method of charging per parcel/acre. <br />OMB Director Joe Baird explained that any fraction over one <br />acre is charged double the rate, any fraction over two acres is <br />charged triple. <br />Mr. Diggs stated that he looked at the tax roll and believes <br />he is the only one in the area being charged three times the rate. <br />He does not see how acreage relates because he does not receive any <br />more benefit than his neighbor who pays for one parcel/acre. <br />County Attorney Charles vitunac explained that the benefit is <br />not how much light falls in how much area. There is a direct <br />relationship to acreage. We use the common denominator of one acre <br />and it seems to work. <br />Mr. Diggs claimed that he has frontage of 80 feet and everyone <br />else has 100 feet or at least equal to 80 feet. <br />Director Baird conceded that none of the assessment methods <br />are 100 percent fair, but we feel that this is the fairest method <br />26 <br />