My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/12/1993
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
10/12/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:55 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:34:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/12/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCT 12 1993 <br />BOOK 90 P,�GET3 1 <br />TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: October 6, 1993 FILE: <br />SUBJECT: Fred Mensing Request <br />FROM• James E. Chandler REFERENCES: <br />County Administrator <br />Attached for your information is a copy of the May 12, 1992 Board minutes, <br />when this matter was previously considered. <br />Chairman Bird recognized Fred Mensing and asked Mr. Mensing to <br />limit his remarks to new material and not repeat what has been <br />discussed before because the Board members have an excerpt of the <br />minutes of the BCC meeting of May 12, 1992, in the agenda backup <br />material. <br />Fred Mensing, 7580 129th Street, Roseland, came before the <br />Board to address the issue of anonymous complaints of code <br />violations. He noted that a year has passed since he last <br />addressed the Commissioners on this subject and he felt that <br />something definite needs to be done. He recounted the details of <br />his original accusations that a code enforcement officer trespassed <br />on his property when his property was posted, and he stated that <br />the problem ultimately was resolved. Mr. Mensing suggested the <br />following corrective action to handle anonymous complaints: The <br />caller should be asked where he/she lives and then be referred to <br />the Commissioner responsible for that district. That Commissioner <br />personally should investigate the complaint to see that the <br />complainer is not guilty of any violations, see that the complaint <br />is legitimate, and then an inspection warrant would be requested. <br />Legitimate violations would be presented to the Code Enforcement <br />Board for action. Mr. Mensing realized that this will cause more <br />work for a Commissioner, but he pointed out that being a <br />Commissioner is not a part-time job. He also did not want to hear <br />the excuse that the proposed plan is unworkable. <br />Mr. Mensing did not know if all Board members were aware that <br />he submitted to a "pat down" by a Deputy Sheriff before his <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.