Laserfiche WebLink
r JAN 31 10A <br />BOOK 91 p,, � -7 <br />`� <br />problem is that when a child is put through the adult criminal <br />justice system and placed into an adult penal institution, we have <br />thrown that child away. Other states have tried leaving the <br />decision to the discretion of the judge, but if a judge in Miami <br />treats a juvenile as an adult and a judge in Jacksonville treats a <br />juvenile as a juvenile for the same crime, that causes problems. <br />Commissioner Adams led discussion regarding punishment versus <br />prevention and asked what type of prevention is planned. <br />The proposed legislation deals with current as well as <br />continuing problems. We must have incentive for people to <br />straighten their lives out. We must have a stick in our hands to <br />steer them away from a life of crime or drug and alcohol abuse. <br />Right now there is nothing to prevent juveniles from committing <br />crimes because there is no fear of the system. Drug rehabilitation <br />programs do not work unless the alternative is harsher than the <br />drug program. The proposed legislation would be the basis for a <br />system of prevention, but it will solve only a part of the juvenile <br />crime problem. <br />Commissioner Adams was concerned about the expense and asked <br />if there are estimates on potential costs. <br />Dr. Norris advised that 60 percent of the current HRS budget <br />for the juvenile justice program is used for the over -14 age group, <br />and some of that 60 percent would help pay for the new system. <br />State Attorney Colton agreed that some of that funding could <br />be diverted to the proposed program. He cautioned that HRS is <br />underfunded when it comes to dealing with juveniles, and he would <br />prefer to see them concentrate on the younger juveniles. He <br />pointed out that the annual cost of the HRS residential program in <br />the high-risk category is $60,000 for each juvenile, while the cost <br />is $16,000 in the adult system. <br />Commissioner Macht asked about parental accountability, and <br />State Attorney Colton advised that a judge can direct the parent or <br />guardian to attend court sessions for their child, but there is no <br />provision that compels the parent to attend. We cannot punish the <br />parent or put a parent in jail for the crime that the child <br />committed, but if a judge puts a child on house arrest in the <br />proposed program, the judge could order that the parent be <br />accountable for that child's whereabouts and report immediately if <br />the child does not comply with the regulations, and the judge could <br />hold the parent in contempt for not following through on that. <br />Mr. Lindsey asked whether we can compel incarcerated juveniles <br />to earn a high school diploma before they are released, and State <br />Attorney Colton responded that we cannot require a child to stay in <br />jail until he receives a high school diploma, but there are <br />10 <br />