My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/1/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
3/1/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:23 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:48:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/01/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
feet or larger, a regional mall would therefore require a site of <br />at least 75 acres. Site requirements, of course, are also <br />influenced by local land development and site plan regulations that <br />determine the required parking, loading, circulation, open space <br />and drainage areas needed to support this size shopping facility. <br />Using this standard, the subject parcel would be adequate for a <br />regional shopping facility. <br />Review of commercially designated lands within the unincorporated <br />portions of the county reveals that, other than the large <br />commercial/industrial nodes located along the interstate, only one <br />node (U.S. #1 from 57th Street to 49th Street, containing the site <br />for the proposed Harbortown Mall) contains an adequate supply of <br />vacant land (over 75 acres) which is also in a configuration <br />suitable for a regional mall facility. Therefore, accommodating a <br />mall in the urbanized area of the county would require <br />redesignating property to a commercial classification. Based upon <br />the land use pattern of the area, the node's centralized location, <br />and its close proximity to the population center, expanding this <br />node boundary would provide for an efficient land use pattern and <br />for the maximum use of transportation and public facilities, while <br />at the same time decreasing strip development, which would occur in <br />other nodes if their areas were increased to accommodate the <br />acreage necessary for the subject request. <br />Another issue involves the proposed Harbortown Mall. As adopted, <br />the Comprehensive Plan already includes an area for a regional <br />mall; that mall site is along U.S. #1 at 53rd Street. It is <br />generally accepted that, despite the rapid population growth in the <br />county, the population base is sufficient to support only one such <br />facility. Despite the fact that one mall has already received <br />initial approval and that only one mall can survive in the county, <br />several reasons exist for the consideration of this request. <br />First, there are no guarantees that the Harbortown Mall will be <br />built. Prior to construction certain public infrastructure <br />improvements must be completed or contracted; leases must be <br />obtained, and financing must be secured. Therefore, the advantage <br />enjoyed by the Harbortown Mall is the land use, zoning, and DRI <br />approval. Second, the prospect of competing regional mall sites <br />reduces the chance of speculation by holding commercially <br />designated land, and increases the likelihood of a regional mall <br />being constructed in the near future. <br />During the land use plan amendment review process for the <br />Harbortown Mall, staff recognized that there is probably no one <br />best site for such a facility and, therefore, provided <br />opportunities for competing proposals to be reviewed. Staff feels <br />that the subject property, like the Harbortown Mall property, <br />should not be used for general commercial development which does <br />not have the size requirements of a regional mall. <br />Because this request is part of a DRI, the county has certain <br />control which is not available in a normal rezoning or plan <br />amendment. That control involves conditioning the DRI Development <br />Order. In this case, to ensure that the subject property is not <br />available for general commercial use (for which there is sufficient <br />land currently available), staff feels that the Development Order <br />should provide sufficient time for the county to redesignate and <br />rezone the property if a regional mall is not constructed. The <br />Harbortown Mall Development Order contains such conditions, and <br />staff will recommend that the Development Order associated with <br />this request also contain such conditions. As a result, the <br />Development Orders will remove the incentive for either developer <br />to realize an economic gain by obtaining a commercial land use <br />43 <br />800K 91 FADE 8,90 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.