Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Eggert supported the Motion because she felt <br />there is a situation on both sides which makes it very difficult. <br />She appreciated Mrs. ErrettIs statement of not wanting to get <br />involved and personalize, but she felt there are some things that <br />we need to watch a little more closely and work with people on. <br />She believed this is one of those situations. She felt it would be <br />very helpful if we could find some way of knowing where everyone is <br />on a more current basis, whether it be their calling in if they <br />haven't been heard from after a certain length of time or whatever <br />it is. <br />Commissioner Bird supported the Motion and agreed there is <br />evidence on both sides. Ms. House did have a bit of trouble in her <br />personal life which had some effect on her job. He would like to <br />see her reinstated but on some type of probation. He believed <br />there was enough evidence and reasonable grounds for staff to do <br />the termination. He would agree to the reinstatement with the <br />understanding that if it takes two Group 2 offenses, Ms. House has <br />one now. If her record is clean for the next 6 months or year or <br />something, then the probationary period would end at that time. He <br />felt there is enough history to warrant some type of probationary <br />procedure. He didn't know exactly what that should be and he would <br />leave that determination to staff and the Personnel Department. <br />Commissioner Eggert understood then that everything that is in <br />Ms. House's folder now stays in her folder and that there is no <br />obliterating it. As she understands Commissioner Macht's motion, <br />another incident of a really serious nature would be cause for <br />termination. She felt there is a punitive factor to that. She <br />didn't feel we could just wipe them out. <br />Commissioner.Macht explained that his Motion encompasses the <br />thought that the Group 2 offense, in fact, the entire presentation, <br />remain intact. As he understood it, Personnel has said that two <br />Group 2 offenses or even four Group 1 offenses may initiate <br />termination. They still would have the option that if another <br />Group 1 offense occurs, coupled with what has occurred, warrants <br />termination, then we can be right back here. <br />Chairman Tippin stated he would support the Motion with the <br />understanding that there would be some type of probationary <br />procedure. He realized that we all make mistakes for various and <br />sundry reasons, but he expected Ms. House to be squeaky clean from <br />now on. <br />23 <br />GOOF 92 FAU, 23 <br />