Laserfiche WebLink
►. Garbage and Trash <br />— Continue Permitting and Design of Landfill Segment III, <br />and Begin Construction by 1996 <br />— Continue Permitting and Design of Infill Between <br />Segments 1 -and 2, and Begin Construction in 1996 <br />► Funding <br />— Assessment Increases as Necessary <br />— Feasibility Analysis of Limiting Number of Cans or Bags <br />Per Setout <br />— Guaranteed Municipality Participation in Solid Waste <br />Disposal District Fixed Costs <br />► Acquisition of Additional Waste Management <br />Facility <br />- Acquire Property to North of District's Existing <br />Facility , <br />. Under discussion, Mr. Hutchinson explained that a density <br />level of 300 people per square mile generally is considered the <br />level at which to implement a curbside recycling program. <br />Commissioner Adams anticipated that mandatory curbside <br />collection of garbage and trash will be a highly controversial <br />matter in this county. She believed that rather than taking the <br />easy way out, we should consider alternatives to curbside <br />collection. However, if or when a curbside program is initiated, <br />she felt we should accept everything that is put out on the curb, <br />such as old carpeting and white goods. Perhaps there could be a <br />super trash pickup once every three or four months. <br />Mr. Hutchinson stated that they would like to avoid mandatory <br />curbside collection, but they just don't see how the County can <br />avoid it any longer. <br />Commissioner Macht inquired about instituting a source <br />separation process, and Mr. Hutchinson affirmed that is a necessary <br />element. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if we are burning everything possible, <br />and Mr. Hutchinson explained that the county does not receive <br />recycling credit for any material that is burned. <br />13 @OGS 9C q�J N <br />APR 1` J 994-- <br />F <br />