Laserfiche WebLink
s e � <br />Transportation System <br />The property has access to 90th Avenue which is classified ' as a <br />collector roadway on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map. <br />This segment of 90th Avenue is a two-lane dirt road with <br />approximately 50 feet of existing public road right-of-way. This <br />segment of 90th Avenue is programmed for expansion to 60 feet of <br />public road right-of-way by 2010. <br />ANALYSIS <br />In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the <br />application will be presented. The analysis will include a <br />description of: <br />• concurrency of public facilities; <br />• compatibility with the surrounding area; <br />• consistency with the comprehensive plan; and <br />• potential impact on environmental quality. <br />Concurrency of Public Facilities <br />This site is located within the County Urban Service Area, an area <br />deemed suited for urban scale development. The comprehensive plan <br />establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, <br />Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage, and Recreation (Future Land Use <br />Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary <br />to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. <br />To ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services <br />and facilities are maintained, the -comprehensive plan also requires <br />that new development be reviewed. For land use amendment requests, <br />this review is undertaken as part of the conditional concurrency <br />determination application process. <br />As per section 910.07 of the County's Land Development Regulations <br />(LDR), conditional concurrency review examines the available <br />capacity of each facility with respect to a proposed project. <br />Since land use amendment requests are not projects, County <br />regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the <br />most intense use of the subject property based upon the requested <br />land use designation. For agricultural land use amendment <br />requests, the most intense use (according to the County's LDR's) is <br />the maximum number. of units that could be built on the site, given <br />the size of the property and the maximum density under the proposed <br />land use designation. The site information used for the <br />concurrency analysis is as follows: <br />1. Size of Area to be Redesignated: t6.4 acres <br />2. Existing Land Use Designation: L- 1, Low -Density <br />Residential -1 (up to 3 <br />units/acre) <br />3. Maximum Number of Units with Existing Land Use Designation: 19 <br />4. Proposed Land Use Designation: AG -1, Agricultural -1 (up <br />to 1 unit/5 acres) <br />5. Maximum Number of Units with Proposed Land Use Designation: 1 <br />As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of <br />the County's LDRs, projects which do not increase density or <br />intensity of use are exempt from concurrency requirements. This <br />APR 121994 33 <br />BOOK 92 1',1 r 1A? <br />I <br />