Laserfiche WebLink
M M <br />identify actions which the county will take in order to direct the <br />community's development. As courses of action committed to by the <br />county, policies provide the basis for all county land development <br />related decisions --including plan amendment decisions. While all <br />comprehensive plan objectives and policies are important, some have <br />more applicability than others in reviewing plan amendment <br />requests. Of particular applicability for this request are the <br />following objectives and policies. <br />- Future Land Use Element Policy 13.3 <br />In evaluating a land use amendment request, the most important <br />consideration is Future Land Use Element Policy 13.3. This policy <br />requires that one of three criteria be met in order to approve a <br />land use amendment request. These criteria are: <br />• a mistake in the approved plan; <br />• an oversight in the approved plan; or <br />• a substantial change in circumstances affecting the subject <br />property. <br />Based upon its analysis, staff feels that the proposed land use <br />amendment meets policy 13.3's second criterion. <br />Prior to February 131 1990, when the current comprehensive plan was <br />adopted, land use was governed by the previous comprehensive plan's <br />future land use map which was adopted in 1982 and last amended in <br />1988 (see attachment 4). <br />Inspection of previous future land use maps shows that the subject <br />property historically had an agricultural designation. Although <br />the Board of County Commissioners never intended to change the <br />subject property's land use designation, an oversight caused the <br />subject property to be included in the expanded L-1 designated area <br />east of I-95 and south of 8th Street. The Board did not consider <br />that agricultural uses existed on the subject property. This <br />oversight occurred when the current comprehensive plan was adopted. <br />For this reason, the proposed amendment meets the second criterion <br />of Future Land Use Element Policy 13.3 and is consistent with <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 13.3. <br />- Future Land Use Element Policy 1.7 <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 1.7 states that the agricultural <br />land use is applied to those areas of the county that have been <br />traditionally used for agricultural purposes and are sufficiently <br />removed from urban areas. This policy also states that the <br />agricultural land use category will ensure continuation of the <br />industry. <br />Located in an -area dominated by agricultural and vacant land, the <br />subject property's only use is and has been agricultural. Since <br />the site, at the edge of the urban service area, is removed from <br />urban development and has traditionally been used for agricultural <br />purposes, the proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use <br />Element Policy 1.7. <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 6.3 <br />Future Larid Use Element Policy 6.3 states that the county shall <br />permit the continuation of agricultural uses east of I-95. The <br />purpose of this request is to provide for the continuation and <br />expansion of an existing agricultural use. Additionally, the site <br />is not only east of I-95, but also contiguous to agriculturally <br />35 <br />APR 121994 <br />KKK 9� FA r.12 <br />