Laserfiche WebLink
C <br />Additionally, <br />can be utilized for <br />monitoring cost fo <br />Tax Program. <br />the determination has also been made that sales tax funding <br />expenses related to previously closed landfills. The $375,000 <br />r the Gifford Landfill is therefore recommended from the Sales <br />Exhibit III provides additional information, analysis, and alternatives for <br />the proposed 800 MHZ system. As submitted, the total system expense has been <br />reduced by $401,687. The proposed county expense has been reduced by <br />$528,365 from $4,610,165 to $4,081,800. Of that amount, $3,841,800 has been <br />proposed for consideration from Sales Tax and $240,000 from E911 revenues. As <br />reflected in Exhibit III, several alternatives will also be presented for <br />consideration at the meeting. <br />As stated previously, the determination. moncerning the Administration <br />Building is critical in the final configuration of the next five year program. <br />Unfortunately, there appears to be no absolute clearcut best alternative. There <br />are strong pro's and con's with respect to every alternative. Exhibit I depicts <br />two options. Option I provides for the originally proposed renovations, and the <br />HVAC retrofitting at a cost of $1,755,500, as well as final land acquisition/design <br />for a new building at a total expense of $3,147,500 during the next five years. <br />Construction of a new facility would commence in the first year of the final five <br />years of the program. Option 2 assumes construction of a new building in the <br />next five years and deletes the renovations and HVAC retrofitting. The <br />estimates are derived directly from the 1991 VOA Space Need Study Master Plan. <br />As reflected in Exhibit IV, utilizing the VOA figures, the net estimated expense <br />would be $12,050,254. If this option is pursued, considering the $5,000,000 <br />required for the courthouse finalization, the $23,287,700 in other projects under <br />consideration would need to be prioritized and reduced by $8,369,619. <br />As indicated previously, when considering the administration building <br />alternatives, there are drawbacks with any approach selected. However, Option <br />1 on balance more adequately addresses overall needs and is more consistent with <br />the goals presented in the original 1989 plan ( Exhibit V) . The subject will be <br />more fully elaborated on at the April 28th workshop. <br />JEC/mg <br />APR 2 8 1994 <br />01 <br />BOOK 92 PAGE .308 <br />