My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/10/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
5/10/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:24 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:06:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />Boor 99 FrAJF •376 <br />MAY 10 1994 <br />—RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends the following: <br />1. Award the bid to Arapaho Citrus Management as the sole <br />bidder for the contract for grove maintenance with the <br />exception of line item 5, page 18 (Drainage <br />Maintenance), this will be done by the Utilities <br />Department along with the mowing. <br />2. Establish an Open End Contract with Arapaho Citrus <br />Management with a not to exceed amount of $45,000.00 <br />during the Contract period. Last year's expenditures <br />was $43,266.01. <br />3. Authorize the Purchasing Manager to renew this contract <br />subject to satisfactory performance, zero cost <br />increase, vendor acceptance, and the determination that <br />renewal is in the best interest of the County. <br />Commissioner Adams asked for further explanation of the costs <br />because it seemed to her that $45,000 is an awful lot of money <br />since we only received $2,000 from the sale of oranges. <br />Administrator Chandler explained that we did make a few <br />hundred dollars above our expenses on this portion of the grove, <br />which is the area that we plan on developing into wetlands as part <br />of our wastewater treatment master plan. When that portion is <br />deleted from the $45,000 contract for next year, a unit price will <br />be applied to -each aspect of the groves. <br />Commissioner Adams also was concerned that the one bid we <br />received wasn't from a management firm in this county. She would <br />like to see this rebid. <br />General Services Director Sonny Dean related how difficult it <br />has been in the past to get firms to bid on this. This year we <br />sent out 15 requests for bids and this is the only bid we received. <br />Utilities Director Terry Pinto noted that although we just <br />broke even on the grove itself, we did get rid of 26 million <br />gallons of effluent on that grove. <br />Chairman Tippin suggested that we offer more alternatives in <br />the bidding. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Macht, that the Board direct staff to <br />rebid this item with more alternatives. <br />Under discussion, Commissioner Bird pointed out that we are <br />breaking even and getting rid of a lot of effluent. In addition, <br />he noted that the owner of the only firm -that bid lives in Indian <br />River County. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.