5/10/1994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MAY 101994 BOOK 92 pAcE -W Alternative No. 1 Formally accept the right-of-way deed along the south portion of 9th Court. No road currently exists in this area where the County did not have a recorded plat on record. Once the right-of-way is accepted, the petition paving project would be added to the Public Works Department list of projects and scheduled for public hearing in late 1995. No petition has been received for paving 11th Street SW between 18th Avenue SW and 9th Court SW so no action is recommended. Alternative No. 2 The property owners currently are requesting the County to construct an unpaved road between 11th Street SW to 9th Street SW. Stormwater permitting would be required. Alternative #2 is to accept the right-of-way, construct an unpaved road at this time, and schedule a public hearing for special assessment paving in 1995. Alternative No. 3 Deny the request since the County has not formally accepted the right-of-way along the south one-half of the project. RECONNENDATIONS AND FUNDING Alternative No. 1 is recommended. No cost will incur until after the Public Hearing is scheduled. No petition has been received for paving 11th Street SW between 18th Avenue and 9th Court so no action is recommended. - Joe Wiggins, speaking on behalf of the residents of 9th Court SW, presented a request for the County to extend 9th Court SW all the way to lith Street SW and just grade the road for six months or so. They have been told that water lines will be installed in six months and they would like to delay the petition paving until after the water project. Edward Netto concurred with Mr. Wiggins. Public Works Director Jim Davis explained that staff is saying that we would prefer to wait until the petition paving comes up on the agenda, at which time we would begin the process of stormwater permitting. He felt the permitting agencies are getting more stringent on impervious surfaces, but we can certainly talk to the St. Johns River Water Management District to see if they would allow us to put an unpaved road south of the existing road. If they agree, we don't have a problem. However, by their definition, marl is 98 percent impervious. The reason we are asking for 60 feet of right-of-way is that it is very difficult to treat the stormwater in 50 feet of right-of-way. We will do the best we can to make this work there. Mr. Netto and Mr. Armstead are agreeable to donating the right-of-way to extend the right-of-way to 11th Street SW. 16