|
1994195 PROPOSED BUDGET
<br />COMPARISON BY FUND AS OF MAY 27,1994
<br />FUND
<br />NAME OF FUND
<br />ACTUAL
<br />1993/94
<br />BUDGET
<br />PROPOSED
<br />1994/95
<br />BUDGET(DECREASE)
<br />INCREASE
<br />PERCENTAGE
<br />OF INCREASE/
<br />(DECREASE)
<br />198
<br />Floralton Beach Streetlightifig
<br />11,823
<br />$1,824
<br />$1
<br />0.05 %
<br />203
<br />Library Bond Issue
<br />$1,653,495
<br />$0
<br />$1,653,495
<br />(100.00)%
<br />204
<br />Refund and Improvement Bonds
<br />$1,382,424
<br />$1,385,128
<br />$2,704
<br />0.20 %
<br />309
<br />Indian River Blvd.-North"
<br />lvd: North$5,600,000
<br />$3,000,000
<br />$2,600,000
<br />(46.43)%
<br />315
<br />Optional One Cent Sales Tax
<br />$7,500,000
<br />$5,516,653
<br />($1,983,347'
<br />(26.44)%
<br />316
<br />Gifford Road Improvements
<br />$680,000
<br />$400,000
<br />$280,000
<br />(41.18)%
<br />411
<br />Solid Waste Disposal District
<br />$8,513,329
<br />$8,912,816
<br />$399,487
<br />.4.69%
<br />418
<br />Golf Course
<br />$2,979,658
<br />$2,901,373
<br />$78,285
<br />(2.63)%
<br />441
<br />County Building Dept.
<br />$867,566
<br />$838,181
<br />($29,385
<br />(3.39)%
<br />471
<br />Utilities
<br />$13,835,137
<br />$15,710,544
<br />$1,875,407
<br />13.56 %
<br />472
<br />Utilities -impact Fee
<br />$2,410,625
<br />$5,582,946
<br />$3,172,321
<br />131.60%
<br />501
<br />Fleet Management
<br />$1,159,657
<br />$1,139,085
<br />$20,572
<br />(1.77)%
<br />502
<br />Self -Insurance
<br />$1,071,178
<br />S1.070229
<br />$949
<br />0.09)%
<br />TOTAL FUNDS
<br />L-1142,441,783
<br />$139,876,136
<br />9 565 647
<br />1.80
<br />(1) Enterprise funds are net of capital in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
<br />Q%123R3%4 BUDQEIIC0WGAAP. WK4
<br />REVISED: 05-27-94
<br />Administrator Chandler pointed out that the budgets submitted
<br />by each of the Departments are extremely lean. There are no
<br />additional full time positions included in any of the BCC budgets
<br />and there is very little capital outlay included. There are two
<br />part-time positions included, one is a lifeguard and another in the
<br />Board office. One full-time position is included in the County
<br />Court budget within the Clerk's budget. There are 10 additional
<br />law enforcement positions in the Sheriff's budget. The budgets
<br />include no funding for salary adjustments with the possible
<br />exception of the constitutional officers.
<br />Administrator Chandler pointed out several entries in the
<br />budgets which were estimates and emphasized that OMB Director Joe
<br />Baird and department heads will continue to work together in this
<br />process. He noted that because we have not received projections of
<br />state -generated revenue nor the County tax rolls, we must deal with
<br />the possibility of a decreased tax roll factor. He recounted that
<br />after the budget was adopted last year and the millage rate was
<br />set, the final tax roll was lower than estimated. At that point
<br />the Board concurred with staff's recommendation not to increase our
<br />millage rate to recoup the revenue which was lost because of the
<br />reduction in the final tax roll. However, we must take into
<br />consideration the differential in our cash forward. He pointed out
<br />that for the last several years we have relied on cash reserves and
<br />we must wean ourselves from relying on those cash reserves because
<br />they are being depleted. Staff's aim is to present a budget with
<br />no increase in taxes in the aggregate. There is a need to decrease
<br />the total budget by $2.4 million.
<br />3
<br />L_ MAY 31 111'S_11�1
<br />BOOK 92 --ma. 553
<br />
|