Laserfiche WebLink
customers coming in and out, and by segregating the deliveries to <br />the rear of the stores fulfills, to some degree, the objective to <br />segregate deliveries from the customers using the facility. <br />Mr. MacLean next addressed the issue of Windward Way being a <br />major roadway. If it is a major road, they maintain that this site <br />plan fails because it does not have the required 100 -ft. separation <br />from the main road. He also questioned the calculation of 1997 <br />car movements within Windward Way. <br />In conclusion, Mr. MacLean presented the following summary: <br />Summary <br />1. 87% of all Moorings residents voted against this project; over <br />700 families who could not be here at this meeting wrote letters <br />opposing Publix. The South Beach Property Owners Association and <br />its members oppose it. With almost a thousand letters and <br />communications against this property - only three people wrote in <br />favoring it. <br />2. The reason that this shopping center (CL Zoning) was not <br />strongly opposed in the comprehensive land -use plan is that it was <br />then described as a "specialty food market", "shopping village", "a <br />number of boutiques" and "groups of individual diverse shops". 'Now <br />it has become a supermarket - and larger than the Publix at Miracle <br />Mile. <br />3-. In a survey of nine other supermarkets in the county the <br />proposed Sea Mist project: <br />A) .Effects more residents (within 300 ft.) than the <br />total of all nine existing supermarkets. <br />B) Could effect property values of almost $40 million <br />of residences, five. times greater than of the total <br />of the other nine supermarkets. The county <br />assessor has real concerns about this issue. <br />Potential degradation of property assessments run <br />into the millions of dollars <br />C) Would be only supermarket in the county: that forces <br />all traffic onto non -arterial roads. <br />D) Would be one of the -few -supermarkets in the county <br />that forces truck unloading to share space with <br />automobiles. <br />4, The Site Plan violates'three important criteria contained in <br />the•county planning regulations: <br />A) The new median cut on the Mooring Line median is <br />too close to the existing Bowline Drive median cut <br />article 952/29, Section 9. <br />82 <br />July 12, 1994 <br />BOOK 92 PAGE 856 <br />