My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/19/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
7/19/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:25 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:36:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/19/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- Future Land Use Element Policy 1.21 <br />Future Land Use Policy 1.21 also applies to this request. This <br />policy states that node boundaries are designed to eliminate <br />commercial strip development and urban sprawl, and to provide for <br />maximum use of transportation and public facilities. The subject <br />property, located on a corner, with access to two arterial roads <br />and one collector road, has ample depth as well as width. Through <br />the DRI Development Order, the county can ensure that the site will <br />be developed as a regional mall facility and in a nodal manner, as <br />opposed to a "Strip Center" type development. For these reasons, <br />the proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use Element <br />Policy 1.21. _ <br />- Future Land Use Element Policy 1.22 <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 1.22 prohibits node expansion closer <br />than 1} miles to an existing node. Under the proposed amendment, <br />the nearest node to the subject node would continue to be more than <br />11 miles from the subject node. Therefore, the proposed amendment <br />is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 1.22. <br />- Future Land Use Element Policy 1.23 <br />Policy 1.23 of the Future Land Use Element states that no node <br />should be considered for expansion unless 70% of the land area <br />(less rights-of-way) is developed or approved for development with <br />non-agricultural and non-residential uses, or otherwise warranted <br />by the proposed development. <br />The intent of this policy is to establish specific criteria for <br />node expansion. Without such criteria, decisions are often <br />arbitrary and inconsistent. The 70% standard then is a measure of <br />whether a node needs to be expanded. <br />In compiling the county's Data Source for Commercial and Industrial <br />Development, staff undertook an analysis to determine the <br />percentage developed or approved for development of each node. <br />Staff proceeded with this analysis by compiling a list of all <br />parcels in each node, obtaining the acreage of each parcel from the <br />Property -Appraiser's tax maps, and aggregating these acreage <br />amounts. Using this method, staff determined that the total size <br />of the subject node is 166 acres. <br />Once the total node acreage was established, the next step was to <br />determine the percent developed with non-agricultural and non- <br />residential uses. Again, the staff used the Property Appraiser's <br />information to do this. Based upon tax and use codes, staff <br />determined which parcels were developed or approved for development <br />with non-agricultural and non-residential uses, and then calculated <br />the acreage of these parcels. Using this method, staff determined <br />that the total non -agriculturally and non -residentially developed <br />or approved to be developed acreage in the node was 77 acres. <br />Based upon this analysis, staff determined that the total non - <br />agriculturally and non -residentially developed land in the node <br />constitutes approximately 46% of the node acreage. This is less <br />than the 70% standard set by Future Land Use Element Policy 1.23. <br />This policy, however, states that a node that is less than 70% <br />developed may be.expanded if otherwise warranted. Policy 1.23 <br />specifically states that otherwise warranted may include certain <br />conditions. One such condition is as follows: <br />Expansion of a node is necessary to accommodate a use <br />(such as a regional mall.) which has a substantial land <br />35 <br />July 19, 1994 <br />�� 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.