My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/26/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
7/26/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:25 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:41:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/26/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK � FAGJ TJS <br />Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of <br />each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning <br />requests are not projects, county regulations call for the <br />concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the <br />subject property based upon the requested zoning district. <br />As discussed in the description and conditions section, the <br />applicant unsuccessfully attempted to convince the owners of the <br />fifty foot wide strip to the east to include that property in this <br />request. Because of uncertainty regarding the inclusion of that <br />Property, staff conducted the concurrency analysis as if the fifty <br />foot wide strip were part of the subject property. Therefore, the <br />impacts of the requested zoning district are actually somewhat <br />overstated in this concurrency analysis. <br />The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as <br />follows: <br />1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: ±40 acres <br />2. Existing Zoning Classification: <br />3. Proposed Zoning Classification: <br />4. Most Intense Use of Subject <br />Property under Existing <br />Zoning Classification: <br />5. Most Intense Use of Subject <br />Property under Proposed <br />Zoning Classification: <br />- Transportation <br />A-1, Agricultural <br />District (up to 1 unit/5 <br />acres) <br />RS -3, Single -Family <br />Residential District (up <br />to 3 units/acre) <br />8 units <br />120 units <br />A review of the traffic impacts that would result from the <br />development of the property indicates that the existing level of <br />service "D" or better on 4th Street would not be lowered. The site <br />information used for determining traffic is as follows: <br />Existing Zoning District <br />1. Use Identified in 5th Edition ITE Manual: <br />Single -Family Residential <br />2. For Single -Family Units, in ITE Manual: <br />a. Average Weekday Trip Ends: 9.55/unit <br />b. P.M. Peak Hour Trip Ends: 1.01/unit <br />C. Inbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 65% <br />i. Westbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 75% <br />ii. Eastbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 25% <br />d. Outbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 35% <br />i. Westbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 25% <br />ii. Eastbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 75% <br />3. P.M. Peak Direction of 4th Street, from 43rd Avenue to 58th <br />Avenue: Westbound <br />28 <br />July 26, 1994 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.