My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/6/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
9/6/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:26 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 2:40:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/06/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
More importantly, several factors indicate that the RM -8 district <br />is the most appropriate for the site. Located near an employment <br />center, a hospital, and various .other medical uses, the site is <br />particularly suited for the multiple -family and institutional uses <br />permitted in the RM -8 zoning district. Additionally, an RM -8 <br />zoning district on the site woiuld provide a logical transition from <br />the more intense uses south and east of the subject property (the <br />medical commercial node and Indian River Boulevard) to the RS -6 <br />zoning district bordering the site on the -north and west. <br />Since the M-1 land use designation allows multiple -family and <br />single-family development with densities of up to eight units/acre, <br />several zoning districts are consistent with the M-1 land use <br />designation. In the past, the Board has not zoned all property <br />with the most intense zoning district allowed under its land use <br />designation. The Board has often placed the densest multiple - <br />family districts along the border of a high impact use such as a <br />commercial/ industrial node or a major road, while reserving less <br />dense, single-family districts for land bordering the multiple - <br />family districts. In this way the intensity of the use of land is <br />gradually decreased as the distance from the high impact use is <br />increased. This strategy, which is consistent with the subject <br />request, reduces the difference between the intensity of use of <br />adjacent lands, thus reducing potential incompatibilities. For <br />these reasons, staff feels that the requested RM -8 zoning would be <br />compatible with the surrounding area. <br />Potential Impact on Environmental Quality <br />Environmental impacts of residential development on the subject <br />property would be essentially the same under either the existing or <br />the proposed zoning district. In fact, changing the zoning of the <br />subject property from RS -6 to RM -8 may enhance. environmental <br />quality by encouraging residential development of the site which is <br />currently a grove. <br />The environmental quality of the site may be enhanced by <br />residential development, because site development would result in <br />construction of a stormwater management system, and protection of <br />jurisdictional wetlands which may be on site. Due to the county's <br />stormwater retention requirements for residential development, <br />residential development on the subject property would reduce the <br />amount of stormwater runoff from the site. The requirements for <br />residential development contrast -with the present agricultural use <br />that allows runoff to occur without any stormwater retention. <br />Prior to residential development of the site, the applicant would <br />be required to complete an environmental survey to determine the <br />extent of any jurisdictional wetlands on the site. That survey <br />would have to be approved by the county's environmental planning <br />staff. <br />Any jurisdictional wetlands determined to be located on the parcel <br />are protected by federal, state, and county regulations. For these <br />reasons, no significant adverse environmental impacts associated <br />with this request are anticipated. <br />CONCLUSION <br />The requested zoning is compatible with the surrounding area, <br />consistent with -the comprehensive plan, meets all concurrency <br />criteria, and will have no negative impacts on environmental <br />quality. The subject property is located in an area deemed suited <br />for medium -density residential uses and meets all applicable <br />rezoning criteria. For these reasons, staff supports the request. <br />59 <br />September 6, 1994 <br />BOOK 93 PAGE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.