Laserfiche WebLink
Board of County Commissioners <br />Meeting Minutes - Final February 6, 2018 <br />BCC consider the following options: 1) Adopt Resolution No. III with the <br />following items: a. Cost per parcel of $5,200.00; b. Nine (9) benefitting parcels <br />as part of the special assessment lien; c. For benefitting parcels in point b, allow <br />property owners to finance the capital cost of $5,200.00 for up to 10 years, <br />payable in ten equal yearly installments at an annual interest rate of 5.00% (set <br />by the BCC each January); and, 2) Allow property owners to connect once the <br />new water main has been placed into service prior to Resolution IV. <br />Attachments: Staff Report <br />Map of Assessment Area <br />Estimated Monthly Expenses for Water Assessment <br />Confirming Resolution (Resolution No. III) <br />Assessment Roll (Exhibit A to Resolution No. III) <br />Director of Utility Services Vincent Burke provided background information <br />and analysis of the proposed water main extension along 103rd Court in Vero <br />Lake Estates Subdivision. Through the use of a PowerPoint Presentation, he <br />explained that an equal per parcel cost of $5,200.00 would be levied against all <br />nine (9) benefiting parcels, and that the property owners would be allowed to <br />finance the costs for up to ten (10) years at an annual rate of 5.00%. Director <br />Burke explained that he had recently learned that several property owners were <br />no longer in favor of the project because of the cost, and he wished to afford <br />them the opportunity to voice their concerns. <br />The Board sought and received information regarding the water connection of <br />two properties that were not included in the assessment and whether there <br />would be a fire hydrant installed on the south end of the project. <br />The Chairman opened the Public Hearing for comments. <br />Dierdre Parker, 8856 103rd Court, opposed the project because of the cost <br />involved and provided a list of signatures from several other residents who <br />were also against the project, but could not be present to speak. <br />There being no further comments, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. <br />The Chairman felt that even though the benefits of the project were significant, <br />he could not be in favor of moving the project forward because there was not <br />enough support from the property owners. <br />Commissioner Zorc recalled the lower per unit costs associated with the Pinson <br />Subdivision Project, and asked Director Burke about the factors that were <br />contributing to the high costs for the water main extension along 103rd Court. <br />Indian River County Florida <br />Page 10 <br />