My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/21/2012 (4)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2012
>
02/21/2012 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2018 4:25:39 PM
Creation date
3/20/2018 4:21:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/21/2012
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EASEMENTS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />9. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND GOVERNMENTAL <br />AGENCIES - NONE <br />10. PUBLIC ITEMS <br />10.A. PUBLICHEARING(S) <br />10.A.1. FUND 101 REFUND ORDINANCE — FINAL CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION <br />(LEGISLATION) <br />PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE <br />OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />(Clerk's Note: This item was heard following Item 13.A. County Attorney Matters and is <br />placed here for continuity.) <br />County Attorney Alan S. Polackwich, Sr., brought forward for Board consideration and <br />final adoption, a draft ordinance providing for the refund of unspent traffic impact fees collected <br />in original Traffic Impact Fee District II (now Fund 101). He reported that revisions have been <br />made subsequent to discussion at the January 17, 2012 County Commission meeting, and after <br />receiving input from staff. He relayed that in the proposed draft, the refund has been set at a <br />specific amount, with interest that is earned during the refund process or generated from refund <br />waivers, to be returned to the fund for the road project; thus, staff would not be issuing a second <br />wave of notices. <br />Charlie Wilson pointed out that Ordinance 86-14 specified that the refunds were to <br />include interest at the rate of six (6) percent a year. He asked that the wording in the proposed <br />Ordinance be amended under Section 3, Subsection (4)(D)(e), to read thus..."each eligible <br />February 21, 2012 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.