Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Davis was opposed to the optional three year extension. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Davis, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Solari, to DENY the <br />optional three-year extension of the six-year period to <br />encumber or spend impact fees. <br />Chairman Wheeler agreed with Vice Chairman O'Bryan that the funds are there to <br />improve the community, and wanted to see the money used for its original purpose. <br />Commissioner Flescher supported the optional three-year extension. He noted that the <br />needs of the community do not disappear because the County has been unable to construct the <br />projects in six years. <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION, and by a 2-3 <br />vote (Commissioners Flescher, O'Bryan, and Wheeler <br />opposed) the MOTION FAILED. <br />ON MOTION by Vice Chairman O'Bryan, SECONDED <br />by Chairman Wheeler, by a 3-2 vote (Commissioners <br />Davis and Solari opposed), the Board approved the <br />optional three-year extension to encumber or spend fees as <br />per Item II under County Attorney matters. <br />Attorney Polackwich brought before the Board Issue III. Should the Optional Three - <br />Year Extension Apply to Impact Fees Currently Held by the County, or Only to Fees Collected <br />in the Future. He explained that currently, the County holds impact fees in two categories, fees <br />for which the six-year period has passed and other fees currently being held for which the six <br />years has not passed. He stated that the extension option could not be applied to fees for which <br />February 21, 2012 24 <br />