Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />throwing stones at it. I, I don't think you're going to <br />get a lot of bang for your buck. <br />And the concern I had from that is that turns <br />into, you know, almost what might be perceived as a loss, <br />you know: In January we have our hearing, Kate and I do <br />the best job we can and we go from what's positive <br />movement in the All Aboard Florida world to now, Oh, the <br />county just sustained a loss, have the tides turned. And <br />that's, that's where I was balancing of: Do we start <br />dialing back the cost, bring it in-house. And again, if <br />that's the direction you all want us to do, I'm fine with <br />that. <br />VICE CHAIRMAN FLESCHER: There was not the <br />strong punt? <br />ATTORNEY REINGOLD: This is not a strong play. <br />VICE CHAIRMAN FLESCHER: So a financially <br />weakened approach -- <br />ATTORNEY REINGOLD: Is a weaker play on a weaker <br />play. <br />VICE CHAIRMAN FLESCHER: Right. And you're not <br />confident on the full impact of the initial play to begin <br />with. <br />ATTORNEY REINGOLD: And it becomes a time issue, <br />for instance, and an energy issue with the challenge to <br />the FDFC case just as a comparison. I knew what that was <br />VERO BEACH COURT REPORTERS <br />772-231-2231 <br />16 <br />