Laserfiche WebLink
it would not prohibit her from making a fair decision regarding this request. None <br />of these disclosures were challenged. <br />Mr. William Schutt, Senior Economic Development Planner, reviewed <br />information regarding the two separate but related requests for rezoning approval <br />and gave a PowerPoint presentation, copies of which are on file in the Board of <br />County Commissioners (BCC) Office. He noted that this case was heard on <br />January 25, 2018 by this Commission with a focus on notice requirements, and <br />although it has since been reconfirmed that Staff followed the correct notice <br />procedures as set forth in the code, the Board agreed to a continuation of the <br />hearing at the request of nearby residents. <br />Mr. Stan Boling, Community Development Director, continued the <br />PowerPoint presentation and reviewed criteria from Policy 1..43 Future Land Use <br />Element as well as the history of zoning in the area surrounding the proposed <br />rezoning request. He discussed a joint meeting between the Applicant and <br />representatives of the Casa Bella Homeowners Association that took place on <br />February 6, 2018 resulting in an agreement for a proposed "alternative zoning <br />map" that would remove the eastern eight acres from rezoning. He also detailed <br />Staffs initiation of rezoning the +/ 0.20 acres owned by the Colley family that it is <br />surrounded by the Schwerin and Others property. He recommended that the <br />Commissioners recommend that the BCC approve the "alternative rezoning <br />request" of +/- 10.14 acres from MED to CG. <br />Mr. Boling proceeded to answer questions from the Commissioners <br />regarding dimensions of the proposed "alternative zoning map" and how the <br />depth compares to nearby commercial properties along US Highway 1. <br />Mr. Bruce Barkett, Representative for the Applicant, and Mr. Kasey <br />Feltner, attorney representing the Casa Bella Homeowner's Association, <br />disclosed their proposed agreement to not rezone the eastern eight acres of the <br />subject property and to place private restrictions on the remaining +/- 10.14 acres <br />that would be rezoned to CG. <br />Mr. Landers voiced his concerns regarding owners of the neighboring MED <br />zoned properties later requesting rezoning for portions of their properties. Mr. <br />Boling responded by citing criteria from Policy 1.43 Future Land Use Element <br />which would be a basis for denying such requests. <br />Chairman Polackwich inquired as to what will likely become of the eastern <br />eight acres of the property that would remain MED zoned as well as nearby MED <br />zoned properties. Mr. Boling advised that the County wants to be sure that there <br />is enough MED zoned area near the hospital available for health-related industry <br />PZC/Unapproved 3 February 8, 2018 <br />F:\BCCWII Committees\P&Z\2018—AGENDAS & MINUTES\PZC 020818.doc 216 <br />