Laserfiche WebLink
Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element <br />conversion mitigation projects into a 10 -year Capital Improvements Plan. As part of the study, a <br />specific formula for the utility service area of Indian River County (IRC) was developed and <br />modeled after similar studies performed for Martin County (Martin County Septic System <br />Evaluation Final Report; CapTec Engineering, Inc.; February 13, 2015) and Brevard County <br />(Save Our Lagoon Project Plan for Brevard County, Florida; TetraTech, Inc and CloseWaters <br />LLC; July 28, 2016). The IRC formula was modified from the formulas used in the Martin and <br />Brevard studies to consider and weigh physical and environmental factors that SBS and IRC staff <br />determined would better represent Indian River County conditions. In the IRC study, the <br />following factors were used in the initial ranking of the three hundred and twenty-five (325) <br />platted subdivisions currently served by septic tanks with respect to potential negative impacts <br />on the lagoon: <br />• Population Density for Loading Concentrations <br />• Proximity to Surface Waters <br />• Location of the Community in Relation to the 100 -year Flood Plain — FEMA Flood Plain <br />• Depth of the Ground Water Table <br />• Soil Conditions of the Drain Field — Soil Type <br />• Age of the Surface Water Management System <br />• Age of the Existing Onsite Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems (OSTDS) <br />Each factor was evaluated for every one of the 325 subdivisions and assigned an index number <br />that generally ranged from 0 to 12, with 0 being the minimum and 12 being the maximum <br />impact. The formula used to determine the ranking was simply the sum of all factor values for <br />that subdivision. The higher the sum (the "score"), the higher the estimated potential negative <br />impact to the Indian River Lagoon (IRL). SBS and IRC staff agreed to weight the "Population <br />Density" and "Proximity to Surface Waters" factors in the IRC study, because those two factors <br />are believed to cause a higher negative impact than the other factors. <br />In the study, the 325 subdivisions served by septic systems were ranked in order where number <br />1 had the highest negative lagoon impact (89.19) and number 325 had the lowest negative <br />impact (26.97). Once the initial ranking was finalized, an Engineers Opinion of Probable Cost <br />(OPC) was estimated for the top thirty five (35) ranked subdivisions having the highest <br />negative impacts. Those top 35 ranked subdivisions were further evaluated based on the <br />following factors: <br />1. Aquatic Health - Environmental Impact Evaluation or the Initial Ranking <br />2. Sewer System Evaluation and Cost Data <br />3. Total Nitrogen (TN)/Total Phosphorus (TP) <br />4. Public Health - Based on the availability of potable water <br />The study evaluated the total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) that could be <br />removed from the environment by septic to sewer conversion and calculated a cost <br />per pound for TN removal for each of the top 35 ranked subdivisions. TP <br />calculations were removed from the analysis since most technical references and studies <br />show that phosphorus is adequately removed by a properly functioning septic <br />Community Development Department <br />Indian River County 22 <br />AttadnAent 4 <br />