Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK b F. I;L ��' 4 <br />PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - APPLICATION OF PUBLIC RECORDS <br />LAW TO AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION APPLICATIONS <br />(originally listed as 12.A.) <br />Assistant County Attorney Terry O'Brien reviewed the <br />memorandum dated November 3, 1994: <br />Toa Board of County Commissioneks <br />FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien, Assistant County Attorney elru <br />DATES November 3, 1994 <br />RE: Application of Public Records law to Ad Valorem Tax <br />Exemption Applications <br />Background <br />At the November 1, 1994, regular meeting of the Board of County <br />Commissioners, Mr. Frank Zorc appeared before the Board for the second <br />time and urged the Board to take legal action against the Property <br />Appraiser for the disclosure of certain information required to be <br />submitted pursuant to Section 196.195, F.S., "Determining profit or <br />nonprofit status of applicant." The Board referred the matter to this <br />office for a legal analysis. <br />Under The Public Records Law, Chapter 119, F.S., all state, county, and <br />municipal records shall be open for personal inspection by any person <br />unless said records are presently provided by law to be confidential or <br />which are prohibited from being inspected by the public. It is the <br />position of the Property Appraiser, Mr. Nolte, that under Section <br />193.074, F.S., "all returns of property" are confidential pursuant to <br />Section 193.074, F.S. In support of his position, he submits the state <br />application for exemption which is entitled "Ad Valorem Tax Exemption <br />Application and Return" (copy attached). In addition, he cites Sec. <br />12D-1.005, F.A.C. These sections are not, in my mind, dispositive of <br />the issue. <br />It is the position of Mr. Zorc that the application submitted under <br />Section 196.195, F.S., "Determining profit or nonprofit status of <br />applicant" is not a "return of property" even though the application <br />form Includes the word "return." <br />Legal Analysis <br />Whether an application filed pursuant to Section 196.195, F.S., is a <br />"return of property" and hence subject to the confidentiality provisions <br />of Section 193.074, F.S., has not been judicially determined. What <br />constitutes a "return of property" was addressed in AGO #91-57 but all <br />It does is agree that there is confusion in that "the phrase 'return of <br />property'' is not defined in Chapter 193, F.S., or elsewhere is the <br />statutes. In the absence of any indication that the Legislature <br />intended this phrase to be used in some 'technical sense, the words <br />should be construed in their plain and ordinary sense. In light of the <br />foregoing, it in my opinion that the phrase 'return of property' is a <br />generic reference to a list, schedule, or inventory of property made by <br />a taxpayer and returned to the property appraiser for the purpose of tax <br />assessment." <br />The Attorney General precedes this with the caveat that it is the duty <br />of the Department of Revenue to develop rules which would settle this <br />problem. A call to the Department of Revenue to ascertain the status of <br />such an application was to say the least not helpful. <br />W, <br />November 15, 1994 <br />