My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/16/2018 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2018
>
10/16/2018 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2021 11:55:12 AM
Creation date
12/14/2018 2:11:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
10/16/2018
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
387
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
committee decided to request additional responses via Demandstar, with a due date of August 22, <br />2018. Three additional responses were received, reviewed and subsequently ranked by the <br />committee. The ranking of supplemental firms developed by the committee is: <br />1. CPZ Architects <br />2. Tsark Architecture, LLC <br />3. Architectural Building Corp. ' <br />All five firms were invited to participate in the interview phase. At the conclusion of the <br />interviews, each committee member listed his or her overall ranking of firms, and a final ranking <br />was established by the committee. All five firms are recommended for award, based on <br />anticipated volume of work and the varied types of capabilities offered by the firms. Final <br />agreements will be presented to the Board at a later date for approval. <br />The final ranking established by the committee is: <br />Responding Firm <br />Location <br />1. CPZ Architects, Inc. <br />Jupiter <br />2. EDB Architects & Associates, P.A. <br />Vero Beach <br />3. Donadio and Associates, Architects, P.A. <br />Vero Beach <br />4. Tsark Architecture, LLC <br />West Melbourne <br />5. Architectural Building Corp. <br />Jupiter <br />FUNDING: <br />Funding for work orders under these agreements will vary, based on project and department. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends the Board approve the committee's final ranking and authorize negotiations <br />with all five of the responding firms in accordance with FS 287.055, Consultant's Competitive <br />Negotiation Act. <br />For October 16, 2018 <br />101 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.