06/16/2015 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Table 2 Swab Sample Results Sample Location Observed Mold Types Dorm (IRC-24) Penicillium—Heavy Growth Ready Room(IRC-25) Penicillium/Aspergillus—Very Light Growth BR#1 (IRC-26) Cladosporium—Very Heavy Growth CONCLUSIONS Based on our visual observations and test results we offer the following conclusions: • Amec Foster Wheeler observed limited areas with Station 10 with water staining, water damage and limited areas of mold growth as confirmed by surface swab testing. Some issues in the building have been addressed as recommended in Amec Foster Wheeler's 2014 assessment report, and some remain to be completed. Amec Foster Wheeler understands that IRC is in process of addressing remaining areas in need of repair or remediation. Assessment methods by ESI were generally observed to be typical of an engineering investigation. • As mentioned earlier, ESI utilized Mycometer li)and Bactiquant®test methods. While the technical basis of the Mycometer®method has been evaluated by the U.S. EPA, these tests are not accepted by the scientific community to be a surrogate for actual traditional analysis of fungi on surfaces and the interpretation guidelines associated with the Mycometer®have not been verified by any independent entity. • Surface moisture levels in all areas evaluated by either IR camera or moisture meter showed no elevated levels of surface moisture or other indications of active water intrusion. - Mold growth was observed in three localized areas: - Small (<1 ft2) area on ceiling tile in middle of Dorm area (IRC-24) - Wood cabinet under sink in Kitchen (IRC-25) - Slight SVG observed on ceiling GWB under peeling paint in shower, above shower head (IRC-26) Mold growth in each area was present on the surface of indicated building materials and was localized to relatively small areas. The observed mold growth was likely due to localized water intrusion 7 32