Laserfiche WebLink
PRECISION CONTRACTING SERVICES INC. <br />Mr. Terrence O'Brien November 16,1994 <br />Assistant County Attorney <br />Indian River County <br />1840 25th Street <br />Vero Beach, FL - 32960 <br />RE: Amendment 42 Contract for CCTV/Audio <br />Mr. O'Brien <br />After receiving notification of the concerns raised in your letter of November 2, I scheduled a meeting with <br />yourself which later led to a meeting with Mr. Jeff Barton, yourself and Mary Louise which ultimately led <br />to a meeting with Mr. Barton, Mr. H.T. "Sonny" Dean and yourself to discuss the circumstances surrounding <br />the above referenced amendment. I feel it necessary to layout once more the sequence of events that have <br />led to the current situation. <br />PCS, Inc. responded tcLaa Request for Qualifications for a Closed Circuit Video/Voice TVnsmission System <br />on Sept. 23, 1992 and entered into a Design/Build Contract to provide a fiber optic cable and lightwave <br />electronics for a single CCTV link between the existing Jail facility and the new Courthouse for a fee of not <br />to exceed $200,000.00. During 1993, at the request of Indian River County's Director of General Services, <br />Mr. H.T. Sonny Dean, PCS began attending the Courthouse advisory meetings which were held to deal with <br />all construction issues of the new courthouse. <br />During this time PCS was negotiating with suppliers to get the most from the $200,000 funding limit placed <br />on the system by the base contract. PCS also advised the committee on several issues ranging from conduit <br />placement inside the courthouse to CCTV equipment and cabling options to right of way acquisition and <br />permitting. <br />On June 6, 1993, PCS was in attendance in an advisory meeting where the issue of audio recording systems <br />was brought up and it was brought to our attention the funding for these systems was left out of the original <br />facility budget. Mr. Dean asked PCS to attend the meetings concerning the "recording" needs which were <br />outside the scope of our contract. PCS complied and received a letter by Keyword Associated, Inc., the <br />vendor of the existing audio recording systems, for an estimated cost of $280,000 to provide for the facilities <br />needs. On June 23, 1993, PCS wrote to Mr. Dean stating we would assist the County in procuring any of <br />the systems discussed at previous "Courthouse Advisory meetings" meetings for a 10% markup plus labor <br />at $35/hour and design/consulting fees of $50/hour. PCS later received a letter of June 24, 1993 from Judge <br />Vocelle requesting we attend a specific meeting on July 21, 1993 concerning the recording.needs and <br />alternatives of the facility. PCS attended the meeting and was asked to comment on the system presented <br />by Keyword. PCS acknowledged Keyword's viability but offered an alternative audio only recording system, <br />Stancil Corp., as well as the potential for audio/video recordings. <br />18223 River Oaks <br />Jupiter, FL 33458 <br />(407) 743-9737 <br />NOVEMBER 22, 1994 <br />Mobile (407) 346-7808 <br />Mobile (407) 371-3297 <br />23 <br />6389 Conroy Road #1712 <br />Orlando, FL 32811 <br />(407) 292-5770 <br />BOOK F��k <br />