Laserfiche WebLink
Since the November 13 Board meeting, staff has updated the abbreviated timeline provided in the <br />November 13 meeting back-up. The updated timeline is attached, formatted to show new <br />information and details in underlining (see Attachment 1). Staff has also provided a site plan project <br />concurrency/impact fee payment flowchart for projects in the County and a flowchart for projects in <br />the City (see Attachments 2 and 3). The City flowchart was recently updated by City after meeting <br />with County staff. <br />As indicated in the updated timeline, in 2002 and 2004 when the City granted change of use site plan <br />approval for the child care facility, City staff followed a procedure whereby approval was granted <br />and then the previous owner/applicant was instructed to contact the Building Department for <br />obtaining a building permit (2002 and 2004 instructions) and to complete a concurrency application <br />with a City sign -off and submit that application to County Planning for processing (2004 <br />instructions). The previous owner/applicant never contacted the Building Department or County <br />Planning yet began the child care operation and eventually sold it Lisden Enterprises in 2004 which <br />later sold to the current owner. No permit or C.O. was requested or issued. The 2008 zoning <br />confirmation letter issued by the City, at the time due diligence was being performed for the current <br />owner, addressed zoning and site plan approval but did not address any other items. As required by <br />state law and licensing requirements periodic inspections of the site by Fire Prevention have been <br />conducted since 1995 for both the ALF and child care uses. County staff discovered the unresolved <br />impact fee issue in 2018 when the current owner applied for a deck permit after which the current <br />owner applied for concurrency as direct by County staff. County staff then researched the use history <br />of the parcel and worked with City staff to determine the highest impact fee credit allowed. <br />County staff has determined that the best case impact fee liability for the current owner/applicant <br />(lowest fee) is under the current impact fee schedule and results in a fee of $7,930.78. If the previous <br />owner had paid impact fees in 2002 and 2004 as required by code, the best case scenario for the <br />owner/applicant at that time (lowest fee) would have been $12,929.81. <br />County site plan procedures for projects in the unincorporated area prevent release of an approved <br />site plan unless project impact fees are paid and concurrency is obtained. With respect to County <br />zoning confirmation letters for sites within the unincorporated area, zoning and use confirmation <br />include verification of a valid site plan approval, permitting, and issuance of a C.O. which also <br />verifies compliance with impact fee requirements. Updated City procedures include a requirement <br />that conditional concurrency (no impact fees paid at that time) be issued prior to City site plan <br />approval. County and City staff are coordinating to put in place more effective <br />City/applicant/County coordination with respect to payment of impact fees. <br />Staff's position is that the subject case is unusual and possibly unique in that a City site plan <br />applicant simply failed to complete a process as instructed by City staff, leading to a violation of the <br />Impact Fee Ordinance. That violation, which was not known to City or County staff, involves a <br />change of use generating increased impacts with no payment of impact fees to help off -set the public <br />improvements necessary to mitigate those impacts. The impact fee ordinance is based on payment of <br />fees for every project generating impacts, without exception, including County projects. Every new <br />County building facility developed since adoption of impact fees included payment of those fees by <br />the County and even incentivized development such as affordable housing and target industries <br />require impact fee payment from some funding source. Consequently, the impact fees owed must be <br />paid by someone; they cannot be simply waived. <br />C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCLTechnologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@ACOE 1509\@BCL@ACOE 1509.doex i o t <br />