Laserfiche WebLink
UPDATED TIMELINE <br />Previous Uses and Actions at 1728 and 1730 24t' Street <br />City of Vero Beach <br />1. Prior to 1995: four homes total existed on both adjacent parcels. Per old survey of the <br />property; 3 single family homes of less than 1500 s.f. each and one single family home of <br />more than 2500 s.f. were located on these 2 parcels. <br />2. 1995: change of use to 19 bed ALF (Minor Change Application #95 -MC -161 approved by <br />the City). 2 single family homes remained on the site. In 1995, the property was <br />purchased by Elderly Loving Care, Inc.). For that change of use no concurrency review <br />was required since change of use reduced the intensity. <br />3. 2002: Building on the west side of the site was changed from ALF to day care (site plan <br />#02 -SP -1064C approved by the City). <br />• City did not require concurrency for or impact fee review Vii; durin change of <br />use review and approval, although the change did increase development intensity. <br />• City did instruct applicant to pick up approved City site plans and visit the Building <br />Department "where you will be given further details on the required procedure for <br />obtaining a building permit" (see Attachment 1). <br />• Applicant/owner did not apply for Building Permit for change of use/change of <br />occupancy as instructed. <br />4. 2004: Change of use approved by City for building on east side of the site to change to <br />day care (Minor Change Application #04 -MC -037 approved by the City, total daycare <br />buildings 6,461 s.f.). <br />• City did not require concurrency for or impact fee review FegaFd44g- during change of <br />use review and approval, although the change did increase development intensity. <br />• Applicant/owner did not apply to County Planning for a concurrency determination. <br />City did instruct applicant to visit the Building Department for further details on <br />permitting and the City also instructed the applicant to complete a concurrency <br />determination application, have the application signed -off by City staff and brought to <br />County Planning for processing (see Attachment 2). <br />• Applicant/owner did not apply for Building Permit for change of use/change of <br />occupancy. <br />• Applicant/owner did not bring concurrency application to County Planning as instructed. <br />• Applicant/owner (Dan Elliot) sold facility to Lisden Enterprises in 2004. <br />Updated: 12/05La..8 <br />F:\Community Development\Users\VICKIE\SASAN\Oxford Academy Previous Use Memo - UPDATED TIMELINE 12-05-18.doa <br />