Laserfiche WebLink
2 CURRENT KNOWLEDGE <br />1. Blue Cypress Lake has been recognized as relatively pristine as shown by the fact <br />the FDEP identified it as a reference lake used to develop state water quality <br />standards. <br />2. Blue Cypress Lake and its connecting waterbodies are Class 1 waters designated for <br />potable water use. <br />3. A sustained upward trend in total phosphorus in Blue Cypress Lake began in <br />.approximately 2006 and is not accompanied by upward total nitrogen trends. Since <br />2014 the upward trend has accelerated. <br />4. The major processes that deliver phosphorus to the lake include surface runoff, <br />groundwater, point source discharges to the lake, and internal loading. <br />5. Agriculture is the primary land use and has remained relatively constant for several <br />decades in the Blue Cypress Lake watershed. <br />6. The use of fertilizers, and more recently biosolids, are the most likely of sources of <br />phosphorus delivered to the lake by these processes. <br />7. Application of Class B biosolids began in 2006 in the Blue Cypress Lake watershed <br />based on the agronomic needs of nitrogen for hay production. Pressley Ranch <br />biosolids applications began in 2013. <br />8. Point sources are less than 1 percent of the total phosphorus load to Blue Cypress <br />La ke <br />9. Water chemistry, in particular dissolved oxygen, was relatively constant before and <br />during the sustained upward trend, suggesting that the internal loading from <br />sediments is unlikely. <br />3 ANALYSIS RESULTS <br />10. Tributary water quality data representing the three major surface water sources to <br />Blue Cypress Lake do not show the upward trend in total phosphorus. <br />11.A phosphorus budget for Blue Cypress Lake based on measured incoming TP <br />concentrations shows and modeled hydrologic fluxes indicates that prior to 2013 the <br />inputs exceeded the outputs from the lake. Since 2013, more phosphorus began <br />leaving the lake then entering the lake which indicates an unaccounted-for source of <br />phosphorus since 2013 source. <br />12. Beginning in 2013 the annual TP application rate downstream of the water quality <br />sampling stations averaged approximately 200,000 pounds per year (Ib/year). That <br />difference means that if only 10 percent of the phosphorus in those biosolids reaches <br />the lake, it would account for all the unaccounted-for phosphorus. <br />13. Class B biosolids applications in the Blue Cypress Lake watershed are based on the <br />agronomic needs of nitrogen for hay production with an assumption based on site- <br />specific testing that phosphorus could generally be taken up by the crop and retained <br />by the soils. The resulting phosphorus loading averages close to 10 times the <br />agronomic needs. <br />4 ONGOING DATA COLLECTION <br />14.The site-specific testing for phosphorus capacity (Mehlic-1) was not done using the <br />method now recommended and used by IFAS in Florida (Mehlic-3). <br />15. Phosphorus Capacity Index results from 11/6/2018 on the Pressley Ranch biosolids <br />application sites show that the 19 of the 23 sites exceed the phosphorus threshold <br />142 <br />