Laserfiche WebLink
consulting services for the subject project. Geosyntec's lump sum proposal, including scope of work, <br />schedule and budget, is shown in Attachment 1. Geosyntec's proposal consists of four phases as follows: <br />PHASE <br />DESCRIPTION <br />$ AMOUNT <br />1 <br />General Consulting/Project Management <br />$ 5,313 <br />2 <br />Review of Background Documents and Liquids Data <br />$ 7,360 <br />3 <br />Evaluation of Liquids Management Options <br />$ 11,700 <br />4 <br />Technical Memorandum <br />$ 6,616 <br />Total = <br />$ 30,989 <br />Geosyntec proposes to submit the technical memorandum within five weeks of the notice to proceed. <br />The first phase includes two meetings: one via conference call to reduce costs, and a second meeting with <br />SWDD and IRCDUS staff to review and discuss findings from the evaluation. The second phase includes <br />reviewing background documents and includes review of a comprehensive sampling and analyses (to be <br />performed separately by SWDD) of the landfill leachate, centrate, and combined liquids for use in the <br />evaluation. The third phase will include compilation of the pertinent data, including the latest analytical <br />data from the three samples and updated flow rates, and conducting a thorough evaluation of this <br />information with respect to: (i) liquid chemistry and treatability; (ii) potentially applicable treatment <br />options and relative costs of these options; (iii) local limits requirements of the WRWWTF; and <br />(iv) feasibility of separating the landfill leachate from the centrate to meet pre-treatment and/or disposal <br />requirements. It is anticipated that the following treatment options will be evaluated: 1) biological <br />treatment using SBR system; 2) RO membrane system; and 3) advanced oxidation. In addition, leachate <br />volume reduction via on-site evaporation will be evaluated as well as a potential option of using "Vetiver <br />grass". The evaluation of each alternative will include feasibility level cost estimates (capital as well as <br />operations and maintenance) for major items required for implementation of each treatment/ <br />management option. Additionally, the evaluation will include non -economic aspects, such as ease of <br />implementation, including permitting and regulatory hurdles; the complexity of the system; robustness <br />of the system; and other requirements. The final phase is a technical memorandum that would provide <br />recommendations on the options/alternatives evaluated for review and consideration by SWDD and <br />IRCDUS staff, and for presentation to the Board at a future meeting. <br />FUNDING: <br />Funding for these professional services is budgeted and available in the Other Professional Services <br />account in the SWDD Landfill Fund, which is funded from SWDD assessments and user fees. This account <br />has a total budget of $120,520 for the 2018/2019 fiscal year. The sampling and analysis would be <br />performed via other contractual services, which are also funded from SWDD assessments and user fees. <br />The account has a total budget of $37,000 for field services and laboratory services. <br />Description <br />Account Number <br />Amount <br />Other Professional Services <br />41121734-033190 <br />$30,989 <br />Field Services & Laboratory Services <br />41121734-033490 <br />$ 5,000 <br />@BCL@580EAB18.docx <br />80 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />