My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/02/2018 (2) VAB
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2018
>
08/02/2018 (2) VAB
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2025 2:30:35 PM
Creation date
3/28/2019 1:28:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Value Adjustment Board
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
08/02/2018
Meeting Body
Value Adjustment Board
Subject
Organizational Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
`Denied by Special Magistrate at Hearing & after Tax Roll. Page 3 of 3 <br />Conclusions of Law for Petition 2017-08052: <br />Florida Law requires the Property Appraiser to establish a.presumption of correctness. For the- Property Appraiser to <br />establish a presumption of correctness for the.,assessment, the. admitted -evidence must prove by a preponderance of the <br />evidence that the Property Appraiser's just valuation methodology complies with Section 193.011, Florida Statutes <br />and professionally accepted appraisal practices. In the instant matter, the ProAppraiser <br />of correctness for the. assessment because the admitted evidence proves by a prep ndrance of the evidence ce thathe <br />Property Appraiser's just valuation methodology complies with Section 193.011, Florida Statutes .and professionally <br />accepted appraisal practices. Since the Property Appraiser established a presumption of correctness, the Petitioner <br />must overcome the established presumption of correctness by proving that the admitted evidence fails to prove by a <br />preponderance of the evidence that: (a) the Property Appraiser's just valuation does not represent just value, or (b) the <br />Property Appraiser's just valuation is arbitrarily based on appraisal practices that are different from the appraisal <br />practices generally applied by the .Property Appraiser to comparable property within the same county. In the instant <br />matter, the Petitioner failed. to overcome the Property Appraiser's established presumption of correctness because the <br />admitted evidence fails to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that: (a) the Property Appzaiser's just valuation <br />does not represent justvalue; or (b) the Property Appraiser's just valuationis arbitrarily. ba sed- on appraisal; practices <br />that are different from the appraisal practices generally applied by the Property Appraiser to comparable property <br />within the same county. Therefore the appraisal should be upheld. <br />-49- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.